Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Artykuły

Nr 4 (47) (2023)

New Form of Justice in 21st Century: Mediation and Online Dispute Resolution

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI47.813
Przesłane
22 listopada 2023
Opublikowane
14.02.2024 — zaktualizowane 21.02.2024
Wersje

Abstrakt

Modern development requires society to create and implement all possible means and mechanisms for peaceful development and progress in the world based on less loss of time and rational actions. Society should well understand that world peace, real introduction of social dialogue, establishment of the culture of dialogue in society - development and much more acceptance of each other in everyday life should be achieved, which is largely a challenge during the last centuries, although all states establish mechanisms at the legislative level, which should reduce disputes in courts and tensions in society.

Bibliografia

  1. Alfini James, Saron Press., Jean Sternlight, Joseph Stulberg, Mediation Theory and Practice. Durnham: Carolina Acaemic Press, 2001.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  2. Berkel Georg, Zur Diskussion gestellt: Deal Mediation als Konfliktbeilegung, Zeitschrift fűr Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) .Kőln: Verlag Otto Schmidt, 2018.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  3. Bhatia Vijay K., Christopher Candin, Maurizio Gotti, Discourse and Practice in International Commercial Abritration, 2012.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  4. Blake Susan, Julie Browne, Stuart Sime, The Jackson ADR Handbook, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  5. Boulle Laurence, Rachael Field, Australian Dispute Resolution (Chatswood: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  6. Brooker Penny, Mediation Law. London: Routledge Taylor &Francis Group, 2013.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  7. Campbell Christian, International Mediation. Wolters Kluwer, 2020.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  8. Chern Cyril, International Commercial Mediation. London: Informa, 2008.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  9. Cortés Pablo, Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the European Union, 2010.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  10. Cortés Pablo, The Law of Consumer Redress in an Evolving Digital Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  11. Englert Klaus, Horst Franke, Winfried Grieger, Streitlosung ohne Gericht – Schlichtung,Schiedsgericht und Mediation in Bausachen. Neuwied: Werner Verlag, 2006.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  12. Esplugues Carlos, „Civil and Commercial Mediation in Europe” Intersentia, Vol. II (2014): 52-53.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  13. Galves Fred, „Virtual Justice as Reality: Making the Resolution of E-commerce Disputes More Convenient, Legitimate, Efficient, and Secure” Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, No. 1 (2009): 120-127.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  14. Glenewinkel Werner, Mediation als ausergerichtliches Konfliktlosungsmodell. Hanover: ibidem-Verlag, 1999.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  15. Göksu Mustafa, „Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution in Turkey” Banka ve Ticaret Hukuru Arastirma Enstitusu, (2016):
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  16. Hola Lenka, Martina Urbanova, Milos Vecera, Jan, Holas, Mediation in the Reflection of Law and Society. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2022.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  17. Hopt Klaus J., Felix Steffek, Mediation Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  18. Johannes Heetkamp Simon, Online Dispute Resolution bei grenzuberschreitenden Verbrauchervertragen. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, Universitatsverlag Osnabruck, 2018.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  19. Kajkowska Ewelina, Enforceability of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses. Oxford-Portland: Hart Publishing, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  20. Katsh Ethan, Colin Rule, „What We Know and Need to Know about Online Dispute Resolution” South Carolina Law Review, No. 2 (2016): 20-30.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  21. Katsh Ethan, Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Digital Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  22. Leung Elsie, „Mediation: A Cultural Change” Asian Pacific Law Review, (2009): 39-46.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  23. Lindblom Henrik, Progressive Procedure: The Role of Courts, Access to Justice, Group Actions, Complex Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Comparative Perspective: Twelve Essays 1985-2015. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  24. Mandatspraxis Schiedsverfahren und Mediation, ed. Jan K. von Schiffer. Köln-Berlin-München, Carl-Heymanns Verlag, 2005
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  25. McLaren Richard H., John P. Sanderson, Innovative Dispute Resolution: The Alternative, Toronto: Carswell, 2006.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  26. Mediationsrecht, ed. Horst Eidenmuller, Gerhard Wagner. Köln: Otto Schmidt 2015.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  27. Nadja Alexander, International and Comparative Mediation. Wolters Kluwer, 2009.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  28. Reuben Richard, Leonard L. Riskin, „The Lawyer Turns Peacemaker” American Bar Association Journal, (1996): 54-62.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  29. Rule Colin, Online Dispute Resolution for Business. San Francisco: Josseey-Bass Publishing, 2002.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  30. Spencer David, Michael Brogan, Mediation Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  31. Susskind Richard, The End of Lawyers?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  32. Susskind Richard, Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  33. Trenczek Thomas, Detlev Berning, Cristina Lenz, H.D. Will, Mediation und Konfliktmanagement. Handbuch, 2nd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  34. Tutzel Stefan, Gerhard Wegen, Stephan Wilske, Commercial Dispute Resolution in Germany, 2nd ed. Munchen: C.H. Beck, 2016.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  35. Vicente Moura, Oliveira Dias, Almeida Gomes, Online Dispute Resolution. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  36. von Bargen Jan Malte, Gerichtsinterne Mediation. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  37. Wahab Abdel Mohamed, Ethan Katsh, Daniel Rainey, ODR: Theory and Practice, A Treatise on Technology and Dispute Resolution, 2011.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  38. Wanner Laura, Institutions and Dispute Settlement, 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff publishing, 2022.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  39. Ware Stephen J., Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 3rd ed. West Academic Publishing, 2016.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  40. Wiebke Voß, „Gerichtsverbundene Online-Streitbeilegung: ein Zukunftsmotell?” Rabels Zeitschrift, No. 1 (2020)
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.