logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Tom 61 Nr 2 (2026): Prawo i Więź

Political-Legal Assessment of Post-Soviet Russia’s First Military Doctrine (1993)

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/b2tgj607
Przesłane
30 listopada 2025
Opublikowane
30 marca 2026 — zaktualizowane 9 maja 2026
Wersje

Abstrakt

This article analyzes the first military doctrine of the Russian Federation (1993) through a rigorous political-legal framework, identifying it as the foundational normative document shaping three decades of Russian strategic behavior. Rather than viewing the document as a military guideline, the research conceptualizes it as a constitutive act of state-building that emerged from the severe constitutional crisis. The paper demonstrates that the doctrine served as a central legal instrument for consolidating power within the executive branch. This security document effectively removed the conventional distinction between external defense and internal security, thereby authorizing the use of military force against domestic political adversaries. A strategic shift is apparent in nuclear strategy; the abandonment of the “No First Use” commitment has transformed the nuclear arsenal into a formidable instrument of global and regional coercion. The article also argues that the doctrine, validated by the 1995 Constitutional Court ruling, consolidated a strategic culture rooted in the primacy of force and in claims to exclusive spheres of influence. Central to this study is an examination of the doctrine’s international legal dimensions. The 1993 doctrine framework institutionalized a systematic subversion of the UN Charter by appropriating peacekeeping terminology to mask unilateral interventions in the “Near Abroad.” Through empirical analysis of conflicts in Georgia, Moldova, and Tajikistan, the article demonstrates how legislative innovations such as “compatriot protection” and “passportization” served as instruments of jurisdictional displacement. Finally, the research traces the normative continuity of these principles across subsequent security documents (2000–2021), concluding that the 1993 doctrine established strategic and legal precedents for Russia’s later military campaigns, specifically the 2008 invasion of Georgia and the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, thus ultimately fueling a self-reinforcing cycle of confrontation with the rules-based international order.

Bibliografia

  1. Al Jazeera. “Russia Can Defend New Regions with Nuclear Weapons: Medvedev.” September 22, 2022. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/9/22/russia-can-defend-new-regions-with-nuclear-weapons-medvedev-says
  2. Arbatov, Alexei G. The Transformation of Russian Military Doctrine: Lessons Learned from Kosovo and Chechnya. Garmisch-Partenkirchen: George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies, 2000. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA478927.pdf
  3. Chantladze, Lasha. “State Responsibility in International Law: Analyzing Russia’s Actions in the War in Abkhazia (1992-1993).” Annales Pomorienses. Ius, no. 3 (2024): 99–107. https://api.upsl.edu.pl/index.php/ius/article/view/71/93
  4. Chantladze, Lasha. “Internal Political Conflict in Russia and the War in Abkhazia (1992-1993).” History, Archaeology, Ethnology, no. XI (2024): 137–151. http://www.sciencejournals.ge/index.php/HAE/article/view/482/426
  5. Blank, Stephen J. Threats to Russian Security: The View from Moscow. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2000. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1133&context=monographs
  6. Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. “Constitutional Case No. 10P concerning the situation in Chechnya.” Judgment of July 31, 1995. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/national-practice/constitutional-case-no-10p-concerning-situation-chechnya-constitutional-court
  7. Halcomb, James F., and Michael M. Boll. Russia’s New Doctrine: Two Views. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 1994. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1260&context=monographs
  8. Higham, Robin and Frederick W. Kagan, eds. The Military History of the Soviet Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
  9. Jojua, Dazmir. Apxazeti 1938–2006 tslebshi: regionaluri istoriuli protsesis aspektebi [Abkhazia in 1938–2006: Aspects of the Regional Historical Process]. Tbilisi: Sokhumi State University, 2009.
  10. Kalichava, Kakhaber. “Legal Grey Zone Exploitation And The Silent Displacement Of A Population: Reframing Russia’s Passportization Policy In Georgia’s Breakaway Regions.” International Journal of Environmental Sciences 11, no. 13s (2025): 387–393. https://theaspd.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/1856
  11. Kotkin, Stephen. Armageddon Averted: The Soviet Collapse, 1970–2000. Updated ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  12. Kozyrev, Andrei. The Firebird: The Elusive Fate of Russian Democracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2019.
  13. Legvold, Robert, ed. Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
  14. Lynch, Dov. Russian Peacekeeping Strategies in the CIS: The Cases of Moldova, Georgia, and Tajikistan. London: Macmillan Press, 2000.
  15. Mälksoo, Lauri. Russian Approaches to International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  16. Murray, Donald. A Democracy of Despots. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.
  17. Pietkiewicz, Michal. “The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation.” Polish Political Science Yearbook 47, no. 3 (2018): 506–509. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018314
  18. Plokhy, Serhii. Lost Kingdom: The Quest For Empire and the Making of the Russian Nation. New York: Basic Books, 2017.
  19. Putin, Vladimir. “Address by the President of the Russian Federation.” September 21, 2022. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69390
  20. Russian Federation. “Address by the President of the Russian Federation.” February 24, 2022. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843
  21. Russian Federation. “O Kontseptsii natsional’noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [On the Concept of National Security of the Russian Federation]. Edict No. 24, January 10, 2000. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/14927
  22. Russian Federation. “O Strategii natsional’noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation]. Edict No. 400, July 2, 2021. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/47046
  23. Russian Federation. “O Voennoi doktrine Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [On the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation]. Edict No. 146, February 5, 2010. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/97383/
  24. Russian Federation. “Osnovnye polozheniya, voennoi doktriny Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [Basic Provisions of the military doctrine of the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, November 18, 1993. https://yeltsin.ru/uploads/upload/2019/12/21/22124076_18.11.1993.pdf
  25. Russian Federation. “Voennaya doktrina Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation]. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation on December 25, 2014. No. Pr-2976. http://www.scrf.gov.ru/security/military/document129/
  26. Slagle, James H. “New Russian Military Doctrine: Sign of the Times.” Parameters 24, no. 1 (1994). https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1697&context=parameters&acrobatPromotionSource=embeddedpdfs_chromenative_view
  27. Sokov, Nikolai. “Why Russia Calls a Limited Nuclear Strike ‘De-escalation.’” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (March 13, 2014). https://thebulletin.org/2014/03/why-russia-calls-a-limited-nuclear-strike-de-escalation/
  28. Suny, Ronald Grigor, ed. The Cambridge History of Russia. Vol. 3, The Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  29. Trenin, Dmitri. Russia. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.
  30. Tsygankov, Andrei P. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. 5th ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2019.
  31. United Nations. Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs. Supplement No. 7, Vol. 1, “Article 2(4).”
  32. United Nations Peacekeeping. “What is Peacekeeping?” https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/what-is-peacekeeping
  33. Venice Commission (European Commission for Democracy through Law). “Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 31 July 1995. On the constitutionality of the Presidential decrees and the resolutions of the federal government concerning the situation in Chechnya.” CDL-INF(1996)001. Strasbourg, 1996. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-INF(1996)001-e
  34. Vorobiova, Anastasiia. “Weaponizing Memory: The Legal Implications... of Russia’s Monument Policy on Occupied Territories of Ukraine.” Prawo i Więź, no. 5 (58) (2025): 437–470. https://doi.org/10.36128/51wrfe35
  35. Zurcher, Christoph. The Post-Soviet Wars: Rebellion, Ethnic Conflict, and Nationhood in the Caucasus. New York: New York University Press, 2007.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.