Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Tom 53 Nr 6 (2024): Prawo i Więź Nr 6 (53) 2024

Cybersecurity of Public Sector Institutions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI53.1129
Przesłane
7 grudnia 2024
Opublikowane
21.03.2025 — zaktualizowane 30.03.2025
Wersje

Abstrakt

In the information society, the public sector must anticipate needs related to the ever-present use of cyberspace for providing services. On the one hand, new technologies facilitate and streamline the fulfillment of public tasks, and on the other hand, they pose threats that might produce far-reaching consequences. This means that public entities are obliged to apply solutions adequate to potential threats. As information and communication technology (ICT) systems being used by public sector institutions should operate uninterruptedly, it is necessary to implement measures to ensure such systems’ resilience to cyberattacks.  Artificial intelligence (AI) might prove helpful for ensuring cybersecurity. However, this technology should be used with caution to prevent damage to the public sector resulting from its improper use.

The research methods used in this paper include both the law theory method and the doctrinal legal research method. These methods were applied to analyze the literature on the subject and legal texts from the perspective of cybersecurity in the public sector. The paper also emphasizes the necessity of considering evolving cybersecurity frameworks that account for the global nature of cyberthreats, as well as the unique challenges faced by public institutions in balancing efficiency with security needs.

Bibliografia

  1. Casalegno Cecilia, Chiara Civera, Damiano Cortese, Alessandr Zardini, „In Search of the Enabling Factors for Public Services Resilience: A Multidisciplinary and Configurational Approach” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, No. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100337.
  2. Czuryk Małgorzata, „Activities of the Local Government During a State of Natural Disaster” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 4 (2021): 111-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.4.111-124.
  3. Czuryk Małgorzata, „Cybersecurity and Protection of Critical Infrastructure” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 5 (2023): 43-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.5.43-52.
  4. Czuryk Małgorzata, „Restrictions on the Exercising of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms Due to Cybersecurity Issues” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 3 (2022): 31-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.3.31-43.
  5. Drabik Krzysztof, „Cyberprzestrzeń – zagrożenia i wyzwania”, [in:] Cyberbezpieczeństwo. Aspekty krajowe i międzynarodowe, ed. Mirosław Karpiuk. 9-20. Warszawa: ASzWoj, 2024.
  6. Gaie Christophe, Karpiuk Mirosław, „The Provision of e-Services by Public Administration Bodies and Their Cybersecurity”, [in:] Transforming Public Services – Combining Data and Algorithms to Fulfil Citizen’s Expectations, ed. Christophe Gaie, Mayuri Mehta. 175-188. Cham: Springer, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55575-6_7.
  7. Gawkowski Krzysztof, „Cyberbezpieczeństwo w inteligentnym mieście” Cybersecurity and Law, No. 2 (2023): 95-105. https://doi.org/10.35467/cal/174921.
  8. Gergelewicz Tomasz, Informacja sygnalna. Katalog obszarów działań antydezinformacyjnych. Warszawa: ASzWoj, 2023.
  9. Hossain Tahsin, Tan Yigitcanlar, Kien Nguyen, Yue Xu, „Local Government Cybersecurity Landscape: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework” Applied Sciences, No. 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135501.
  10. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, „Digital Competencies of the General Public and the State’s Vulnerability to Cyberspace Threats”, [in:] The Public Dimension of Cybersecurity, ed. Mirosław Karpiuk, Jarosław Kostrubiec. 29-37. Maribor: Lex Localis Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4335/2022.1.3.
  11. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, „Etyka a prawo w edukacji”, [in:] Prawo w poszukiwaniu prawdy, dobra i piękna. Księga Jubileuszowa ks. prof. Sławomira Fundowicza, ed. Paweł Śwital, Bartosz Kuś, Emilia Gulińska. 775-482. Radom: Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 2024.
  12. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, Mirosław Karpiuk, Claudio Melchior, „A Holistic Approach to Cybersecurity and Data Protection in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data” Prawo i Więź, No. 3 (2024): 103-121. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.907.
  13. Karpiuk Mirosław, „Recognising an Entity as an Operator of Essential Services and Providing Cybersecurity at the National Level” Prawo i Więź, No. 4 (2022): 166-179. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi42.524.
  14. Karpiuk Mirosław, „The Legal Status of Digital Service Providers in the Sphere of Cybersecurity” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 2 (2023): 189-201. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.189-201.
  15. Karpiuk Mirosław, Jarosław Kostrubiec, „Provincial Governor as a Body Responsible for Combating State Security Threats” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 1 (2024): 107-122. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.1.107-122.
  16. Karpiuk Mirosław, Claudio Melchior, Urszula Soler, „Cybersecurity Management in the Public Service Sector” Prawo i Więź, No. 4 (2023): 7-27. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI47.751.
  17. Kellerman Aharon, Geographic Interpretations of the Internet, Cham: Springer, 2016.
  18. Marczyk Maciej, „Cyberprzestrzeń jako nowy wymiar aktywności człowieka – analiza pojęciowa obszaru” Przegląd Teleinformatyczny, No. 1-2 (2018): 59-72.
  19. Miller Seumas, Terry Bossomaier, „Cybersecurity: Threats, Countermeasures, and the Institutional Landscape”, [in:] Cybersecurity, Ethics, and Collective Responsibility, ed. Seumas Miller, Terry Bossomaier. 12-54. New York: Oxford Academic, 2024.
  20. Mushtaq Shahrukh, Shah Mahmood, „Critical Factors and Practices in Mitigating Cybercrimes within E-Government Services: A Rapid Review on Optimising Public Service Management” Information, No. 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100619.
  21. Obermeyer Ziad, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, Sendhil Mullainathan, „Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations” Science, No. 6464 (2019): 447-453.
  22. Sadik Shahrin Sadik, Mohiuddin Ahmed, Leslie Sikos, Najmul Islam, „Toward a Sustainable Cybersecurity Ecosystem” Computers, No. 9 (2020): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers9030074.
  23. Sandu Arun, „DevSecOps: Integrating Security into the DevOps Lifecycle for Enhanced Resilience” Technology & Management Review, No. 6 (2021).
  24. Strizzolo Nicola, Smart grid, i pericoli di una rete energetica connessa. https://www.agendadigitale.eu/sicurezza/smart-grid-i-pericoli-di-una-rete-energetica-connessa/. [accessed: 18.11.2024].
  25. Strizzolo Nicola, Eleonora Sparano, „Inconsapevolezza Artificiale. Dalla fiducia alla fede nelle macchine” Sociologia. Rivista Quadrimestrale di Scienze Sociologiche, Storiche e Giuridiche, No. 3 (2024): 6-7.
  26. Tyrawa Dominik, „Krajowy system cyberbezpieczeństwa w świetle nauki prawa administracyjnego. Uwagi wybrane” International Journal of Legal Studies, No 1 (2023): 13-30. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9004.
  27. Writz Berndt, Weyerer Jan, „Cyberterrorism and Cyber Attacks in the Public Sector: How Public Administration Copes with Digital Threats” International Journal of Public Administration, No. 40 (2016): 1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1242614.
  28. Żebrowski Andrzej, „Cyberprzestrzeń miejscem walki (wojny) informacyjnej (wybrane aspekty)”, [in:] Współczesny człowiek wobec zagrożeń w cyberprzestrzeni, ed. Joanna Grubicka, Aneta Kamińska-Nawrot. 9-36. Słupsk: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pomorskiej w Słupsku, 2020.
  29. Zhang Mengzhong, Manpreet Kaur, „Toward a theory of e-government: Challenges and opportunities, a literature review” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, No. 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.7707.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.