Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Nr 3 (2024): Prawo i Więź Nr 3 (50) 2024

Uniform Civil Code, Legal Pluralism and Inheritance Rights… of Tribal Indian Women

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.857
Przesłane
13 lutego 2024
Opublikowane
21.08.2024

Abstrakt

The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution heralded India as a „Sovereign, Socialist, Secular Democratic Republic”. It initiated a constitutional narrative that has sparked ongoing debates and scrutiny regarding the true essence of India's secularism. As the nation approaches the 2024 general elections, the ruling party has discussed the potential implementation of the Uniform Civil Code at the forefront of political discourse.  In this commentary, the authors discuss legal pluralism in India and the impact of the introduction of a uniform civil code on on customary laws of tribes, placing special emphasis on the inheritance rights of tribal women. The paper also discusses the approach of the higher courts in securing property rights for tribal women in the absence of such a code.

Bibliografia

  1. Afaq Ahmar, Sukhvinder Singh Dari, „Understanding Uniform Civil Code: Its Need and Challenges” Russian Law Journal, No. 1S (2023), https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i1S.358.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  2. Ahmmed F., „Challenges of Aging and Coping Mechanisms among the Khasi and Garo Tribal Groups: An Ethnographic Observation” Journal of International Social Issues, No. 1 (n.d.): 23-38.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  3. Ambedkar B. R., Vasant Moon, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, 2014.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  4. Ambedkar B. R., Sharmila Rege, Against the Madness of Manu: B.R. Ambedkar’s Writings on Brahmanical Patriarchy. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing Pvt. Ltd, 2013.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  5. Ao Temsula, „Land, Ethics and Economic Management among Ao Nagas” Institute of Northeast India Studies, 1 (2010).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  6. Das J.N., A Study of Land System in Manipur. Law Research Institute of Guwahati High Court, 1989.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  7. Das Ranga Ranjan, „Gender, Customary Laws and Codification – The North-Eastern Perspectives”, [in:] Gender Implications of Tribal Customary Law: The Case of North-East India. North Eastern Social Research Centre ; Rawat Publications, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  8. De Sousa Santos Boaventura, „Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law” Journal of Law and Society, No. 3 (1987): 279-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  9. Galanter Marc, „Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, No. 19 (1981): 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756257.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  10. Ghosh Gitanjali, „Gender Preference in Customary Inheritance Laws of the Khasi Tribe in India: Myth or Fact?” SSRN Electronic Journal, (2021), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793397.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  11. Gissel Line Engbo, „Nomos and Narrative in International Criminal Justice” Journal of International Criminal Justice, No. 1 (2022): 117-138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac004.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  12. Griffiths John, „What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24 (1986).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  13. Hart H. L. A., Leslie Green, Joseph Raz, Penelope A. Bulloch, The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2012.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  14. Hooker Michael Barry, Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  15. Mahanta Aparna, „Understanding Politics of Identity and Ethnicity in North East India: A Gender Perspective”, [in:] In Souvenir: North East India History Association. Dibrugarh, 2008.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  16. Malinowski Bronislaw, Crime and Custom in Savage Society. NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  17. Merry Sally Engle, „Legal Pluralism” Law & Society Review, No. 5 (1988): 869. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  18. Misra Bani Prassana, „Agrarian Relations in a Khasi State” Economic and Political Weekly, No. 20 (1979): 888-892.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  19. Moore Sally Falk, „Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study” Law & Society Review, No. 4 (1973): 719-746. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  20. Mukhim Patricia, „Crisis of Authority in the Khasi Matrilineal Society”, [in:] The Dynamics of Family System in a Matriliny of Meghalaya. Tribal Research Institute, 1999.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  21. Nongbri Tiplut, „Khasi Women and Matriliny: Transformations in Gender Relations” Gender, Technology and Development, No. 3 (2000): 359-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2000.11909976.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  22. Pakyntein Valentina, „Gender Preference in Khasi Society: An Evaluation of Tradition, Change and Continuity” Indian Anthropologist, Indian Anthropological Association, 30 (2000): 27-35.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  23. Pal Samaraditya, Deepan Kumar Sarkar, India’s Constitution: Origins and Evolution: Constituent Assembly Debates, Lok Sabha Debates on Constitutional Amendments and Supreme Court Judgments. Gurgaon, Haryana, India: LexisNexis, 2017.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  24. Pospisil Leopold, Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York Evanston San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1971.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  25. Rajak Komal, „Trajectories of Women’s Property Rights in India: A Reading of the Hindu Code Bill” Contemporary Voice of Dalit, No. 1 (2020): 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X19898420.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  26. Rivers W. H. R., Social Organisation. Stephen, Austin & Sons Ltd., 1924.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  27. Singh Jyoti, Kajori Bhatnagar, „Evaluating the Categorical Exclusion of Khasi Women from Inheritance and Property Rights: A Case of East Khasi Hills” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 30 January (2024): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10143.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  28. Singh M. P., „On Uniform Civil Code, Legal Pluralism And The Constitution Of India” Journal of Indian Law and Society, Vol. V (2014).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  29. Tamahana Brain Z., „Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global” Sydney Law Review, 29 (2007).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  30. Woodman Gordon R., „Ideological Combat and Social Observation: Recent Debate about Legal Pluralism” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, No. 42 (1998): 21-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1998.10756513.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.