Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Prawo i Więź

Artykuły

Nr 4 (2024): Prawo i Więź Nr 4 (51) 2024

Cooperative Intermediate Housing Tenures in Poland and Germany

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI51.905
Przesłane
12 maja 2024
Opublikowane
27.09.2024

Abstrakt

This paper presents a comparative analysis of cooperative tenures available in housing cooperatives in Poland and Germany. The research is based on the typology that understands property rights from the moderate constructivist approach and applies them to housing tenures by means of the analysis of the distribution of specific bundles of property rights which appears to be different across the housing tenures. Innovative intermediate tenures as housing options beyond tenancy and homeownership are approached and supported for a particular reason – as remedies to address the growing European housing crisis. So, the article contains a comparative analysis of the features of cooperative housing tenures as intermediate tenures for international comparisons of „affordable” and „social housing” options.

Bibliografia

  1. Beuthien Volker, Daniel Brunner, „Haben Wohnungsgenossenschaften eine Zukunft?” Die Wohnungswirtschaft, No. 6 (2002): 14-22.
  2. Blandy Sarah, Jennifer Dixon, Ann Jennifer, „Theorising Power Relationships in Multi-Owned Residential Developments: Unpacking the Bundle of Rights” Urban Studies, No. 13 (2006): 2365-2383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600970656.
  3. Cesarski Maciej, „Dorobek materialny spółdzielczości mieszkaniowej w Polsce [The Material Output of the Housing Cooperative Sector in Poland]”, [in:] Historia i przyszłość spółdzielczości mieszkaniowej w Polsce [History and Future of the Housing Cooperative Sector in Poland], ed. Zbigniew Gotfalski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo „Dom”, 2011.
  4. Coudroy de Lille Lydia. „Housing Cooperatives in Poland. The Origins of a Deadlock” Urban Research & Practice 8, No. 1 (2015): 17-31.
  5. Czischke Darinka, Gerard van Bortel, „An Exploration of Concepts and Polices on ‘affordable housing’ in England, Italy, Poland and the Netherlands” Journal Housing and the Built Environment, 38 (2023): 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9598-1.
  6. Elsinga Marja, „Affordable and low risk home ownership”, [in:] Home Ownership: Getting in, Getting from, Getting out, ed. Peter Boelhouwer, John Doling, Marja Elsinga. 75-94. Delft: DUP Science, 2005.
  7. Elsinga Marja, „Intermediate Housing Tenures”, [in:] International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, ed. Susan J. Smith. 124-129. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.
  8. Erläuterungen zum Gesetz über das Wohnungseigentum und das Daierwohnrecht, 15th ed, ed. Johannes Bärmann. München: C. H. Beck, 2023.
  9. Feather Christopher, „Between Homeownership and Rental Housing: Exploring the Potential for Hybrid Tenure Solutions” International Journal of Housing Policy, No. 4 (2018): 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1520543.
  10. Gorczyca Mirosław, „Mieszkalnictwo w Niemczech [The Housing in Germany]” Wiadomości Statystyczne [The Polish Statistician], No. 2 (2016): 88-94.
  11. Gorczyca Mirosław, „Mieszkalnictwo w Niemczech [The Housing in Germany]” Wiadomości Statystyczne [The Polish Statistician], No. 6 (2010): 72.
  12. Granath Hansson Anna, Jenny Paulsson, Peter Ekbäck, „The Sliding Scale between Usufruct and Ownership: The Example of Swedish Multi-Family Housing” Land, No. 3 (2021): 311-315. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030311.
  13. Habdas Magdalena, „Poland”, [in:] Ways out of the European Housing Crisis: Tenure Innovation and Diversification in Comparative Perspective. 238-265. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.
  14. Haffner Marieta, Daniel Brunner, „German Cooperatives: Property Right Hybrids with Strong Tenant Security” OTB Working Papers, 7 (2014): 1-15. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:cb635acb-b59a-455b-bd63-ae8b1d01fc98.
  15. Hegedüs József, Martin Lux, Nóra Teller, Social Housing in Transition Countries. London: Routledge, 2013.
  16. Jedliński Adam, Piotr Zakrzewski, „Zarys Projektu wykorzystania spółdzielczego lokatorskiego prawa do lokalu mieszkalnego w Narodowym programie budowy mieszkań [The Outline of Using Co-operative Tenant Rights to the Dwelling in the National Housing Program]” Prawo i Więź [Law and Social Bonds], No. 3 (2017): 11-20.
  17. Jenkis Helmut, Kommentar zum Wohnungsgemeinnützigkeitsrecht. Hamburg: Hammonia Verlag, 1988.
  18. Keßler Jürgen, „Commentry to § 1 GenG”, [in:] Berliner Kommentar zum Genossenschaftsgesetz, 2nd ed., ed. Klaus-Peter Hillebrand, Jürgen Keßler. 1-45. Hamburg: Hammonia Verlag, 2010.
  19. Kramer Jost, „Die Stuktur deutscher Genossenschaften im Lichte der Property-Rights-Theorie”, [in:] Genossenschaftsmodelle – zwischen Auftrag und Anpassung. Festschrift für Rolf Steding, ed. Marcus Hanisch. 285-296. Berliner Beiträge zum Genossenschaftswesen Band 56: Berlin, 2002.
  20. Kuhnert Jan, Konzept für eine Neue Wohngemeinnützigkeit, 28 listopada 2022. Deutscher Mieterbund. www.netzwerk-mieten-wohnen.de.
  21. Libecap Gary, Contracting for Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  22. Mańko Rafał, „The Cooperative Member’s Proprietary Right to an Apartment: a Legal Survival of the Period of Actually Existing Socialism in Polish Private Law” Zeszyty Prawnicze, No. 4 (2015): 147-173.
  23. Marcuse Peter, „Property Rights, Tenure and Ownership: Towards Clarity in Concept”, [in:] Social Rented Housing in Europe: Policy, Tenure and Design, ed. Berth Danermark, Ingemar Elander. 21-36. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University Press, 1994.
  24. Monk Sarah, Christine Whitehead, „Why Intermediate Housing Markets?”, [in:] Making Housing More Affordable: The Role of Intermediate Yenures, ed. Sarah Monk, Christine Whitehead. 2-3. London: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  25. Muzioł-Węcławowicz Alina, „Mieszkalnictwo społeczne w Polsce – wyzwania i ograniczenia [Social Housing in Poland: Challenges and Barriers]” Studia BAS, No. 2 (2021): 83-112.
  26. Myczkowski Lesław, Nowa ustawa o spółdzielniach mieszkaniowych [The New Housing Cooperatives Act], Zielona Góra: Zachodnie Centrum Organizacji, 2001.
  27. Napiórkowska-Baryła Agnieszka, „The Process of Transfromation of Rights to Residential Units in Housing Cooperatives in Poland” Olsztyn Economic Journal, No. 2 (2011): 219-226.
  28. Ofiarska Małgorzata, „Finansowanie zwrotne przez Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego inwestycji objętych rządowym programem popierania budownictwa mieszkaniowego – wybrane zagadnienia” Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego, 8 (2022): 11-19. https://doi.org/10.33226/0137-5490.2022.8.2.
  29. Pelzl Wolfgang, Die Gründung von Mietergenossenschaften zur Erhaltung von sozialem Wohnraum. Nürnberg: Veröffentlichungen des Forschungsinstituts für Genossenschaftswesen an der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg vol. 25., 1987.
  30. Pietrzykowski Krzysztof, „A Century of Codification of the Cooperative Law in Poland” Studia Prawnicze KUL, No. 4 (2022): 51-63. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.13720.
  31. Pinkel Tobias, Annika Schulenberg, Valerie Müller, Christoph U. Schmid, „Germany”, [in:] Ways out of the European Housing Crisis: Tenure Innovation and Diversification in Comparative Perspective. 183-218. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.
  32. Ruonavaara Hannu, „How Divergent Housing Institutions Evolve: A Comparison of Swedish Tenant Co-operatives and Finnish Shareholders’ Housing Companies” Housing, Theory & Society, No. 4 (2005): 213-236.
  33. Ruonavaara Hannu, „Theory of Housing, From Housing, About Housing” Housing, Theory and Society, No. 2 (2018): 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1347103.
  34. Ruonavaara Hannu, „Types and Forms of Housing Tenure: Towards Solving the Comparison/Translation Problem” Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 10 (1993): 3-20.
  35. Schaefers Thomas, „Der § 17 Eigenheimzulagengesetz – seine Entstehung und Wirkung für die Wohnungsbaugenossenschaften” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 49 (1999): 138-143.
  36. Schmale Ingrid, „Die Eigentumsfrage – ein kontroverses Dauerthema bei (Wohnungs)-Genossenschaften?” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 49 (1999): 133-137.
  37. Schmid Christoph U., „Tenure Reform as a Means to Address the European Housing Crisis”, [in:] Ways out of the European Housing Crisis: Tenure Innovation and Diversification in Comparative Perspective. 1-4. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.
  38. Skotarczak Tadeusz, Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka, „Spółdzielnie mieszkaniowe w nowym otoczeniu społeczno-gospodarczym”, [in:] Spółdzielnie mieszkaniowe: Dylematy funk¬cjonowania i rozwoju, ed. Tadeusz Skotarczak. 11-37. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2015.
  39. Snare Frank, „The Concept of Property” American Philosophical Quarterly, No. 2 (1972): 200-206.
  40. Stephens Mark, „Social Rented Housing in the (DIS) United Kingdom: Can Different Social Housing Regime Types Exist within the Same Nation State?” Urban Research and Practice, No. 1 (2019): 38-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1381760.
  41. Tsenkova Sasha, Housing Policy Reforms in Post-Socialist Europe. Lost in Transition. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 2009.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.