Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 3 (2024): Law & Social Bonds Nr 4 (50) 2024

Cooperation of the Constitutional Court and the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights in 1998-2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.400
Submitted
March 17, 2022
Published
2024-08-21

Abstract

Russia recognized the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights in 1998. Initially the cooperation between the Russian judiciary and the Court developed well. The rulings of the Court were executed, the Russian law as amended in accordance with the European standards. Since 2010 the situation has changed significantly. The Russian authorities started to emphasize Constitutional Court’s „sovereignty” and to neglect Court’s rulings. The following paper aims to identify two periods in the cooperation of the Russian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights. Particular attention was paid to the legal mechanisms that were adopted by the Constitutional Court in order not to carry out rulings of the European Court. The Constitutional Court of Russia expressed a thesis that international treaties and international court’s decisions in the hierarchy of the sources of law occupy a position below the Constitution. Consecutively, it was confirmed by the amendments to the bill on the Constitutional Court and the Constitution of Russia. In 2022 Russia lost membership in the Council of Europe what means the abandonment of the European legal order. There is no doubt that in the Russian Federation the status of the international treaties, including the European Convention of Human Rights, depends on the political situation in this country and Russia’s authorities’ attitude towards cooperation with the international community.

References

  1. Aranovsky Konstantin V. „Uslovia soglasovaniya praktiki mezhdunarodnogo i konstitucionnogo pravosudiya” Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudia, nr 3 (2013): 1-10.
  2. Blankenagel Aleksandr, Iliya Levin, „V principia nielzia, no mozhno!.. Konstutcionnyi Sud Rossii i delo ob obyazatelnosti reshenij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka” Sravnitelnoe konstitucionne obozrenie, nr 5 (2015): 152-162.
  3. Budaev Kapiton A., „O nekotoryh raznoglasiyah Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka i Konstitucionnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii po zashhite prav i svobod grazhdan Rossii: puti ih razresheniya” Lex Russica, nr 12 (2017): 95-108.
  4. Czachor Rafał, „Reforma konstytucyjna w Federacji Rosyjskiej w 2020 roku” Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, nr 3 (2021): 261-276. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2021.03.17.
  5. Czachor Rafał, „«Suwerenna demokracja»: geneza, treść, krytyka współczesnej rosyjskiej myśli polityczno-prawnej” Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem, t. 42, nr 3 (2020): 47-69. https://doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.42.3.3.
  6. Entin Mark L. „Politiko-pravovye posledstviya vstupleniya Rossii v Sovet Evropy.” Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, nr 3 (1996): 97-111.
  7. Filimonov Anton, ESPCh: nuzhen li on Rossii i zachem. https://www.garant.ru/article/565493/.
  8. Hudolej Konstantin M., „Konstitucionnyj Sud RF i ESPCZ: istoriya razvitiya otnoshenij” Ex jure, nr 1 (2022): 48-63.
  9. Implementaciya reshenij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka v rossijskoj pravovoj sisteme: koncepcii, pravovye podhody i praktyka obespeheniya, red. Vladimir V. Lazaryev. Institut Zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya: Moskva, 2020.
  10. Kartashkin Vladimir A., „Rossiya i Evropeiskaya konvenciya o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod.” Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, nr 3 (1996): 21-27.
  11. Kirilenko Anastasiia. Resheniya Njurnberga – pod somnenie? https://www.svoboda.org/a/1735679.html.
  12. Kovler Anatoliy I., „Sootnoshenie evropeyskogo konvencionnogo i nacional’nogo konstitucionnogo prava – obostrienie problemy (prichiny i sledstviya)” Rossijskij jezhegodnik Evropejskoj konvencii po pravam cheloveka, nr 1 (2015): 19-65.
  13. Kovler Anatoliy, „Russia: European Convention on Human Rights in Russia: Fifteen years after”, [w:] The Impact of the ECHR on Democratic Change in Central and Eastern Europe: Judicial Perspectives, red. Iulia Motoc, Ineta Ziemele. 351-372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  14. Marchenko Mikhail N., Istochniki prava. Uchebnoe posobie, Moskva: Moskovkiy gosudarstviennyi Universitet, 2013.
  15. Marochkin Sergei, „ECtHR and the Russian Constitutional Court: duet or duel”, [w:] Russia and the European Court of Human Rights The Strasbourg Effect, red. Lauri Mälksoo, Wolfgang Benedek. 93-124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
  16. Massias Jean Pierre, Russia and the Council of Europe: Ten Years Wasted. Paris: Institut Francais des Relations Internationales, 2007.
  17. Micińska-Bojarek Magdalena, „Status umów międzynarodowych w rosyjskim prawie konstytucyjnym.” Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, nr 5 (2016): 223-236. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2016.05.13.
  18. Roter Petra, „Russia in the Council of Europe: Participation à la carte”, [w:] Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, red. Lauri Mälksoo, Wolfgang Benedek. 26-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  19. Vaypan Grigoriy, „Trudno byt’ bogom: Konstitucionnyi Sud Rossii i ego pervoe delo o vozmozhnosti ispolneniya postanovleniya Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka.” Sravnitelnoe konstitucionne obozrenie, nr 4 (2016): 107-124.
  20. Wiśniewski Adam, „Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka trybunałem konstytucyjnym Europy?” Prawo i Więź, nr 4 (2020): 320-347. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi34.207.
  21. Zorkin Valeriy D., „Predel ustupchivosti” Rossijskaya gazieta, 29 października 2010.
  22. Zorkin Valeriy D., „Rossiya i Strasburg” Rossijskaya gazieta, 22 października 2015.
  23. Zorkin Valeriy D., „Konstitucionnyi Sud na perehodnom etape istoricheskogo razvitiya Rossii” Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudiya, nr 4 (2016): 1-7.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.