Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Law & Social Bounds

Articles

No. 3 (46) (2023)

Euthanasia and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights: Twenty Years After Pretty v. United Kingdom

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI46.699
Submitted
May 7, 2023
Published
2023-11-17

Abstract

The author focuses on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in two sensitive areas related to the end of human life, notably euthanasia and the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (passive euthanasia). These highly controversial issues required the Court to answer crucial questions regarding the scope and essence of the obligations of state parties under Article 2 (the right to life) and Article 8 (the right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Over twenty years ago, in Pretty v. United Kingdom (2002), the concise formulation of Article 2 of the ECHR inevitably led the Court to conclude that the Convention does not guarantee the „right to euthanasia”. However, this has not prevented the Court from inferring a general right to decide on one's end of life as an element of privacy protected under Article 8 of the ECHR. Since the judgment in Pretty, the case law of the Court on assisted suicide and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment has been balancing between conflicting interests. Having adjudicated several landmark cases, mainly from the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Belgium, Germany, and France, the Court has calibrated the essence and scope of the states' margin of appreciation to allow (or not allowing) assisted suicide and the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. However, one should not expect that the Court's standards will satisfy everybody's expectations, given the different philosophical, ethical, and religious approaches to human death and the state's role in protecting the right to life.

References

  1. Biggs Hazel, Euthanasia. Death with Dignity and the Law. Oxford-Portland: Hart 2001.
  2. Cohen Miriam, Jasper Hortensius, „A human rights approach to end of life? Recent developments at the European Court of Human Rights” Revista do Instituto Brasileiro de Direitos Humanos, No. 17/18 (2018): 193-210. https://revista.ibdh.org.br/index.php/ibdh/article/view/384/363.
  3. Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria, 2022.
  4. Fellmeth Aaron, Nourin Abourahma, „The Human Right to Suicide under International Law” Human Rights Law Review, No. 3 (2021): 641-670. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngab010.
  5. Fikfak Veronika, Lora Izvorova, „Language and Persuasion: Human Dignity at the European Court of Human Rights” Human Rights Law Review, No. 3 (2022): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac018.
  6. Gerards, Janneke, „Right to Life”, [in:] Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Pieter van Dijk, Fried van Hoof, Arjen van Rijn, Leo Zwaak. 353-380. Cambridge-Antwerp-Portland: Intersentia, 2018.
  7. Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations, Council of Europe 2014. https://www.coe.int/en/web/bioethics/guide-on-the-decision-making-process-regarding-medical-treatment-in-end-of-life-situations.
  8. Le Moli Ginevra, Human Dignity in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021.
  9. Martin Stevie, Assisted Suicide and the European Convention on Human Rights. London-New York: Routledge 2021.
  10. Papadopoulou Nataly, „From Pretty to Nicklinson: changing judicial attitudes to assisted dying” European Human Rights Law Review, vol. 3 (2017): 298-307.
  11. Regulating the End of Life. Death Rights, ed. Sue Westwood. London-New York-Routledge 2021.
  12. Schabas William, The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  13. Zannoni Diego, „Right or duty to live? Euthanasia and assisted suicide from the perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights” European Journal of Legal Studies, No. 2 (2020): 181-212. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2019.027.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.