Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
logo czasopisma

Articles

Vol. 53 No. 6 (2024): Law and Social Bonds nr 6 (53) 2024

The Union Civil Protection Mechanism in the Face of Modern Emergencies – de lege lata and de lege ferenda Remarks

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI53.839
Submitted
January 20, 2024
Published
2025-03-21

Abstract

The European Union is confronted with increasingly severe natural disasters and new and more complex threats. Numerous emergencies in recent years have demonstrated the limitations of the structural elements and operational capabilities of the Union Mechanism for Civil Protection (UMOL). A challenge for EU civil protection, supported by the UMOL, is the rapid and efficient coordination of assistance in major emergencies, including multi-sectoral and cross-border crises involving several countries. Past experience with extreme weather events and the Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need to strengthen the UMOL through new capabilities and better management. Climate change, technological developments and hybrid threats are expected to increase the number of civil protection missions in the future. New challenges will require the implementation of new forms of civil protection operations in Europe and globally, which will determine changes in the legal and political framework of the UMOL.

References

  1. Dobnik Jeraj Milena, Sandra Martinič, „Spremembe na področju civilne zaščite na ravni Evropske Unije (EU)” UJMA, nr 33 (2019): 258-265.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  2. Feltynowski Mariusz, „Union Civil Protection Mechanism an an International Policy Tool Supporting Ukraine” Polish Political Science Yearbook, t. LII (2023): 1-15.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  3. Fink-Hooijer Florika, „The UE’s competence in the field of civil protection (article 196, paragraph 1, a-c TFEU)”, [w:] EU Management of Global Emergencies. Legal Framework for Combating Threats and Crises, red. Inge Govaere, Sara Poli. Leiden: Brill, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004268333_009.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  4. Forzieri Giovanni et al., „Multi-hazard assessment In Europe under climate change” Climatic Change, t. CXXXVII (2016): 105-119. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-016-1661-x. DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1661-x.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  5. Forzieri Giovanni et al., Increasing risk over time of Feather-related hazards to the European population: a data-driven prognostic study, 2017. https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanplh/PIIS2542-5196(17)30082-7.pdf. Doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30082-7.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  6. Gajda Anastazja, „Działania Unii Europejskiej w zakresie ochrony ludności przed klęskami żywiołowymi i katastrofami spowodowanymi przez człowieka”, [w:] Unia Europejska w przededniu Brexitu, red. Jacek Barcik, Magdalena Półtorak. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2018.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  7. Górski Sławomir, Współczesna ochrona ludności. Aspekty prawne i organizacyjne. Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej, 2016. https://bibliotekasgsp.locloudhosting.net/files/original/a02d1c5e4d54af6e7eef1e69487c3e56.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  8. Halleux Vivienne, „Union Civil Protection Mechanism 2021-2027” EPRS: European Parliamentary Research Service, (2021). https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1526321/union-civil-protection-mechanism-2021-2027/2214487/.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  9. Kozioł Aleksandra, „Reforma Unijnego Mechanizmu Ochrony Ludności podczas pandemii” Biuletyn PISM, nr 244 2020. https://pism.pl/publikacje/Reforma_Unijnego_Mechanizmu_Ochrony_Ludnosci__podczas_pandemii.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.