Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 53 No. 6 (2024): Law and Social Bonds nr 6 (53) 2024

Procedural and Organizational Safeguards in Forced Return Cases of Third Country Nationals as the Limitation of the EU Freedom in Reacting to Migration Crisis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI53.1157
Submitted
December 16, 2024
Published
2025-03-21

Abstract

The basic purpose of the paper is to analyse EU regulations on the forced returns of third-country nationals in the context of procedural and organizational safeguards that the alien may invoke. However, the appropriate approach requires placing them in the broader framework of international norms, mainly adopted by the United Nations or enshrined by the European Convention on Human Rights. This perspective will allow us to answer whether the universal international standard of procedural and organizational protection in alien expulsion proceedings exists and whether its relation to this one is based on EU law. On the other hand, since we talk about procedural and institutional guarantees, comparing it with the general protection of these rights under art. 6 ECHR and 47 Charter of Fundamental Rights of UE is worth comparing. Such an approach will help understand how the level of protection in expulsion proceedings differs from the default European procedural and organizational standard. The fundamental question is whether the procedural guarantees envisaged by the EU law constitute a real obstacle to agile management by the EU member states with the immigration crises they were confronted with in 2015-2016.

References

  1. Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, red. Pieter Dijk, Fried Hoof, Arien Rijn, Leo Zwaak, Antwerpia-Oxford: Intersentia, 2006.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  2. Boková Terezie, Radislav Bražina, „Expulsion of aliens, non-refoulment and issues related to administrative discretion” Institutiones Administrationis – Journal of Administrative Sciences, 1 (2021): 90-103.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  3. Kidane Won, „Procedural Due Process in the Expulsion of Aliens under International, United States and European Union Law: A Comparative Analysis” Emory International Law Review, 27 (2013): 287-346. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1101&context=eilr
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  4. Cooper Jonathan, „Procedural Due Process, Human Rights and the Added Value of the Right to a Fair Trial” Judicial Review, 78 (2006): 78-91.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  5. García Andrade Paula, „The EU Accession to the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees: Legal Feasibility and Added Value” Spanish Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 23 (2019). https://www.sybil.es/sybil/article/view/245.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  6. Konwencja o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności, t. I-II. red. Lech Garlicki. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2010.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  7. Jacobs Francis, Robin White, Clare Ovey, The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  8. Lorenzmeier Stefan, „The Right to a Fair Trial in Europe? – Procedural Guarantees under the European Convention on Human Rights” Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, 7 (2007): 40-49. https://www.proquest.com/docview/213964297?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  9. Martin Susan, Sanjula Weerensinghe, Abbie Taylor, „Crisis Migration” The Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol. XX (2013): 123-137. https://isim.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2019/08/20.1_Martin.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  10. Cezary Mik, „Ochrona prawa do słusznego procesu w sprawach cywilnych w Europeskiej Konwencji o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności” Biuletyn Centrum Europejskiego Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, nr 3 (1995): 48-78.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  11. Mowbray Alastair, „The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights” Human Rights Law Review, nr 1 (2005): 59-79. https://academic.oup.com/hrlr/issue/5/1.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  12. Molnár Tamás, „EU Migration Law Shaping International Migration Law in the Field of Expulsion of Aliens: The Empire Strikes Back?” Pécs Journal of International and European Law, II (2017): 40-61. https://real.mtak.hu/84817/1/Tamas%20Molnar_EU_ILC_Empire%20Strikes%20Back_PJIEL_2017-2.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  13. Nowicki Marek A., Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej. Komentarz do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2017.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  14. Pasamonik Barbara, Urszula Markowska-Manista, „O kryzysie migracyjnym z perspektywy pedagogiczno-psychologicznej”, [w:] Kryzys migracyjny. Perspektywa społeczno-kulturowa, red. Barbara Pasamonik, Urszula. Markowska-Manista. 7-14. Warszawa Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej, 2017.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  15. Raczycki Oskar, „Wspólny europejski system azylowy i acquis wobec kryzysu migracyjnego w Europie” Rocznik Strategiczny (2015-2016): 414-431. https://wnpism.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/23_2016.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  16. Sahin-Mencutek Zeynep, Soner Barthoma, N. Ela Gökalp-Aras Anna, Traindafyllidou, „A Crisis Mode in Migration Governance: Comparative and Analytical Insights” Comparative Migration Studies, 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00284-2.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  17. Sakara Natalia Y., „The Right to a Fair Trial and a Modern Civil Procedure Model” Problems of Legality, 65 (2018): 65-79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329639395_The_right_to_a_fair_trial_and_a_modern_civil_procedure_model/link/5c132830299bf139c756d29f/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  18. Schabas Wiliam A., The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  19. Sullivan John, „Closed Materials Procedures and the Right to a Fair Trial” Maryland Journal of International Law 29 (2014): 269-292. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1620&context=mjil.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  20. Ślęzak Jarosław, „Instytucjonalizacja ochrony praw uchodźców w systemie ONZ” Cywilizacja i Polityka, 7 (2009): 75-93. https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/cywilizacja/article/view/9645.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  21. Wagner Martin, Alan Desmond, Albert Kraler, „UE Police Framework on Irregular Migrants” Mirrem Working Paper, 8 (2024). https://www.icmpd.org/file/download/61067/file/MIRREM%2520Working%2520Paper_EU%2520Policy%2520Framework%2520on%2520irregular%2520migrants.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  22. Węc Janusz J., Powstanie i rozwój przestrzeni wolności, bezpieczeństwa i sprrawiedliwości w ramach Unii Europejskiej (1197-2004). https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/1bc4c8f6-1bcc-45ed-a871-022d92db6d78/content.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.