Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
logo czasopisma

Articles

No. 3 (2024): Law & Social Bonds Nr 4 (50) 2024

In Search of Adequate Principles of AI Civil Liability

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.829
Submitted
January 2, 2024
Published
2024-08-21

Abstract

Questions about self-awareness of artificial intelligence (AI) and the perspective of full autonomy of AI systems show how complex issues the legislator will have to cope with to establish a legal framework adequate to advanced AI. Although the development of AI systems has not reached the level mentioned above, we already have to deal with the problem of inadequacy of the existing legislative regime to factual situations in which an AI system has caused damage. This article examines the civil liability of AI systems in EU legislation. The analysis discusses current problems with AI liability, proposals of the European Union legislator on how to solve existing problems and includes de lege ferenda suggestions. Conclusions from the observations made allow to answer whether the legal solutions offered by the Products Liability Directive proposal and the AI Liability Directive proposal are adequate to the identified problems with liability for AI systems.

References

  1. Fairgrieve Duncan, Geraint Howells, Peter Møgelvang-Hansen, Gert Straetmans, Dimitri Verhoeven, Piotr MacHnikowski, André Janssen, Reiner Schulze, „Product Liability Directive”, [in:] European Product Liability: An Analysis of the State of the Art in the Era of New Technologies, ed. Piotr Machnikowski. 46. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2016.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  2. Gerstner Maruerite E., „Liability Issues with Artificial Intelligence Software” Santa Clara Law Review, No. 1 (1993): 239-269. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss1/7/.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  3. Gilead Israel, „Product Liability in Israel”, [in:] European Product Liability: An Analysis of the State of the Art in the Era of New Technologies, ed. Piotr Machnikowski. 546–547. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2016.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  4. Jagielska Monika, „Odpowiedzialność za sztuczną inteligencję [Liability for Artificial Intelligence]”, [in:] Prawo sztucznej inteligencji [The Law of Artificial Intelligence], ed. Luigi Lai, Marek Świerczyński. 69-79. Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2020,
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  5. Jagielska Monika, Odpowiedzialność za produkt [Product Liability]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2009.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  6. Lior Anat, „AI Strict Liability Vis-à-Vis AI Monopolization” Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, No. 1 (2020): 90-126. https://doi.org/10.52214/stlr.v22i1.8055.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  7. European Product Liability: An Analysis of the State of the Art in the Era of New Technologies, ed. Piotr Machnikowsk. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2016.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  8. Masci Pietro, „The History of Insurance: Risk, Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship” Journal of the Washington Institute of China Studies No. 3 (2011): 25-68. https://www.academia.edu/45474658/The_History_of_Insurance_Risk_Uncertainty_and_Entrepreneurship.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  9. Radwański Zbigniew, Zobowiązania – część ogólna [Obligations – General], 2nd ed. Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 1998.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  10. Rojszczak Marcin, Marcin Rojszczak, „Prawne aspekty systemów sztucznej inteligencji. Zarys problemu [Legal Aspects of Artificial Intelligence Systems: Outline of the Problem]”, [in:] Sztuczna inteligencja, blockchain, cyberbezpieczeństwo oraz dane osobowe. Zagadnienia wybrane [Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Cybersecurity and Personal Data: Selected Issues], ed. Kinga Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Jacek Gołaczyński, Dariusz Szostek. 1-22. Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2019.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  11. Russell Stuart, Human Compatible: AI and the Problem of Control. UK, USA, Canada, Ireland, Australia, India, New Zealand, South Africa: Penguin Books, 2019.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  12. Smuha Nathalie A., Emma Ahmed-Rengers, Adam Harkens, Wenlong Li, James MacLaren, Riccardo Piselli, Karen Yeung. How the EU Can Achieve Legally Trustworthy AI: A Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3899991.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  13. Swanson Greg, „Non-Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Programs and Products Liability: How New Al Products Challenge Existing Liability Models and Pose New Financial Burdens” Seattle University Law Review, No. 3 (2019): 1201-1222. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol42/iss3/11/.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  14. Sykes Alan O., „The Law and Economics of «Forced» Technology Transfer and Its Implications for Trade and Investment Policy (and the U.S.–China Trade War)” Journal of Legal Analysis, No. 1 (2021): 127-171.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa007.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  15. Veale Michael, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, „Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach” Computer Law Review International No. 4 (2021): 97-112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  16. Vladeck David C., „Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence” Washington Law Review, No. 1 (2014): 117-150. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol89/iss1/6.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  17. Wendehorst Christiane, „Strict Liability for AI and other Emerging Technologies” Journal of European Tort Law, No. 2 (2020): 179. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2020-0140.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.