Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
logo czasopisma

Articles

No. 3 (2024): Law & Social Bonds Nr 4 (50) 2024

Paradigmatic Models of Mediation, Mandatory Eclectics or a Direct Decision

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.883
Submitted
March 13, 2024
Published
2024-08-21

Abstract

 

The article conceptually reviews the paradigmatic models of mediation, to understand the professional role of a mediator and the scope of ethical obligations. The description of each model showcases the corresponding action of a mediator and the standard of intervention in the process and studies their effectiveness in achieving the goals of mediation. In this regard, the paper examines the content of a mediator's ethical obligations and potential dilemmas in different mediation models, which might be associated with a mediator's direct and uniform choice of a particular mediation model. The article emphasizes the importance of a mediator's competence for the proper flow of a process and, at the same time, analyzes the necessity to strictly demark it from the professional role of an attorney, which is essential for the ethical execution of a mediator's role.  

References

  1. Alexander Nadja, International and Comparative Mediation Legal Perspectives. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2009.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  2. Alfini James, „Evaluative versus Facilitative Mediation: A Discussion” Florida State University Law Review, No. 4 (1997): 926. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1447&context=lr.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  3. Anderson Dorcas Quek, „Facilitative Versus Evaluative Mediation, Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?” Asian Journal on Mediation, (2013): 68. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2889142.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  4. Boulle Laurence, Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice. Chatswood, N.S.W: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2005.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  5. Boulle Laurence, Miryana Nesic, Mediation: Principles, Process. London: Tottel, 2001.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  6. Boulle, Laurence, Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice. Butterworths: Lexis Nexis, 2011.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  7. Bush Robert Baruch, „Substituting Mediation for Arbitration: The Growing Market for Evaluative Mediation, and What it Means for the ADR Field” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, No. 1 (2002):122. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol3/iss1/6.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  8. Bush Robert Baruch, Joseph Folger, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  9. Bush, Robert Baruch, Folger, Joseph, The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. United States of Amerika: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  10. Chern Cyril, The Commercial Mediator’s Handbook. New York: Informa Law from Routledge, 2015.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  11. Chowdhury Jamila, Gender Power and Mediation, Evaluative Mediation to Challenge the Power of Social Discourses. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 2012.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  12. Chowdhury Jamila, Gender Power and Mediation, Evaluative Mediation to Challenge the Power of Social Discourses. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 2012.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  13. Clark Bryan, Lawyers and Mediation. Heidelberg: Springer, 2012.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  14. Coben James Richard, Peter Thompson, „The Haghighi Trilogy and the Minnesota Civil Mediation Act: Exposing a Phantom Menace Casting a Pall Over the Development of ADR in Minnesota” Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy, 20 (1999): 299-324. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1723301.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  15. Craver Charles, „The Use of Mediation to Resolve Community Disputes, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy” New Directions in Community Lawyering Social Entrepreneurship, and Dispute Resolution, 48 (2015): 237. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol48/iss1/13.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  16. Dubler Nancy, Carol Liebman, Bioethics Mediation, A Guide to Shaping Shared Solutions. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2011.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  17. Ethical Mediation, Advocate, Vancouver Bar Association, Vol. 79, part 6, 857.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  18. Feehily Ronán, International Commercial Mediation, Law and Regulation in Comparative Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  19. Feerick, John et al., „Standards of Professional Conduct in Alternative Dispute Resolution” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 1 (1995): 101-102.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  20. Field Rachael, Jonathan Crowe, Mediation Ethics, From Theory to Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  21. Folger Joseph, Robert A. Baruch Bush, „Transformative Mediation, A self-assessment” International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, No.1 (2014): 20-34.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  22. Freund James, Anatomy of a Mediation: a Dealmaker's Distinctive approach to Resolving Dollar Disputes and other Commercial Conflicts. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2012.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  23. General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l'Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé. ed. Schauer Martin, Bea Verschraegen. The Netherlands: Springer, 2017.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  24. Golann Dwight, „Variations in Mediation: How – and Why – Legal Mediators Change Styles in the Course of a Case, Journal of Dispute Resolution” University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, No. 1 (2000): 42. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=jdr.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  25. Hinshaw Art, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Sarah Rudolph Cole, Discussions in Dispute Resolutioni. The Foundational Articles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  26. Hopt Klaus, Felix Steffek, Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  27. Hyman Jonathan, Lela Love, „If Portia Were a Mediator: An Inquiry into Justice in Mediation” Clinical Law Review, (2002): 157. https://www.pgpmediation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/If-Portia-Were-a-Mediator-9-Clinical-L-Rev-157.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  28. Imperati Samuel, „Alternative Dispute Resolution Symposium Issue: Mediator Practice Models: The Intersection of Ethics and Stylistic Practices in Mediation” Willamette Law Review, (1997): 2-7. https://www2.mediate.com/ICM/docs/Willamette%20Law%20Review%20Excerpt.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  29. Kandashvili Irakli, Mediation. Tbilisi: Cezanne, 2022 (in Georgian).
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  30. Laflin Maureen, „Preserving the Integrity of Mediation Through the Adoption of Ethical Rules for Lawyer-Mediators” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, No. 1 (2000): 486. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol14/iss1/14.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  31. Lee Joel, Marcus Tao Shien Lim, Contemporary Issues In Mediation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2016.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  32. Levin Murray, „The Propriety of Evaluative Mediation: Concerns about the Nature and Quality of an Evaluative Opinion” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. XVI (2001): 267-296. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159560678.pdf.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  33. Love Lela, „The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate” Florida State University Review, No. 4 (1997): 939. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1448&context=lr.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  34. Love Lela, John Cooley, „The Intersection of Evaluation by Mediators and Informed Consent: Warning the Unwary” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, No. 1 (2005): 45-46.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  35. Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes, ed. Catharine Titi Katia Fach Gómez. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  36. Moberly Robert, „Mediator Gag Rules: Is It Ethical for Mediators to Evaluate or Advise?” South Texas Law Review, 38 (1997): 772.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  37. Moffitt Michael, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Examples & Explanations: Dispute Resolution. United States: Aspen Publishers, 2011.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  38. Munjal Diksha, „Tug of War: Evaluative versus Facilitative Mediator” Pretoria Student Law Review, 6 (2012): 72-73, 79. https://upjournals.up.ac.za/index.php/pslr/article/view/2137/2022.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  39. Noce Dorothy Della, „Evaluative Mediation: In Search of Practice Competencies” Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27 (2009): 139, 208-209. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2263813.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  40. Nolan-Haley Jacqueline, „Court Mediation and the Search for Justice through Law” Washington University Law Review, No. 1 (1996): 65-66.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  41. Nolan-Haley Jacqueline, „Informed Consent in Mediation: A Guiding Principle for Truly Educated Decision-making” Notre Dame Law Review, 74 (1999): 797, 834-838. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/274/.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  42. Nylund Anna, Kaijus Ervasti, Lin Adrian, Nordic Mediation Research. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  43. Ordover Abraham, Andrea Doneff, Alternatives to Litigation, Mediation, Arbitration and the Art of Dispute Resolution. Boulder: National Institute for Trial Advocacy, 2014.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  44. Pou Charles, „Assuring Excellence, or Merely Reassuring? Policy and Practice in Promoting Mediator Quality” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 2 (2004): 303-354. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1470&context=jdr.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  45. Riskin Leonard, „Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques” Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, No. 9 (1994): 111-114. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1506704.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  46. Riskin Leonard, „Understanding Mediators' Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed” Harvard Negotiation Law Review, No. 7 (1996): 8-51, 35-36. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/668.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  47. Roberts Kenneth, „Mediating the Evaluative-Facilitative Debate: Why Both Parties Are Wrong and a Proposal for Settlement” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, No. 1 (2007): 192, 198.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  48. Roberts Marian, Mediation in Family Disputes, Principles of Practice. London-New York: Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group, 2014.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  49. Russel Murray, The Mediation Handbook, Effective Strategies for Litigators. Denver Colorado: Bradford Publishing Company, 2011.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  50. Santos Hugo Luz dos, Towards a Four-Tiered Model of Mediation Against the Background of a Narrative of Social Sub-systems in Everlasting Cross-Fertilization. Singapore: Springer, 2023.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  51. Self-Determination in Mediation, The Art and Science of Mirrors and Lights. ed. Dan Simon, Rara West. Lan Ham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2022.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  52. Shapira Omer, „Joining Forces in Search for Answers: The Use of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Realm of Mediation Ethics” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, No. 2 (2008): 244.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  53. Shapira Omer, A Theory of Mediator’s Ethics, Foundations, Rationale and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  54. Stark James, „Preliminary Reflections on the Establishment of a Mediation Clinic” Clinical Law Review, 2 (1996): 487. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/law_papers/166.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  55. Stark James, „The Ethics of Mediation Evaluation: Some Troublesome Questions And Tentative Proposals, from an Evaluative Lawyer Mediator” South Texas Law Review, 38 (1997): 795. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1198&context=law_papers.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  56. Stempel Jeffrey, „The Inevitability of the Eclectic: Liberating ADR from Ideology” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 2 (2000): 247, 275. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/217.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  57. Stitt Alan, Mediation Practical Guide. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2016.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  58. Tallodi Timea, How Parties Experience Mediation, An Interview Study on Relationship Changes in Workplace Mediation. Springer International Publishing, 2020.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  59. The Negotiator’s Fieldbook, The Desk Reference for the Experienced Negotiator, ed. Schneider Andrea Kupfer, Christopher Honeyman. Washington, DC: ABA Section of Dispute Resolution, 2006.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  60. Waldman Ellen, Mediation Ethics, Cases and Commentaries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  61. Weckstein Donald, „In Praise of Party Empowerment And of Mediator Activism” Willamette Law Review, 33 (1997): 526.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  62. Wolski Bobette, „An Ethical Evaluation Process for Mediators: A Preliminary Exploration of Factors Which Impact Ethical Decision-Making” Ethics in Alternative Dispute Resolution, No. 1 (2017-2018): 69, 70, 71.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  63. Zena Zumeta, „A Facilitative Mediator Responds” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 2 (2000): 337. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2000/iss2/8.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.