Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 4 (2024): Law & Social Bonds Nr 4 (51) 2024

THE ASSET LOCK UNDER THE REGULAR OPERATION OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN ITALY

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI51.906
Submitted
March 31, 2024
Published
2024-09-27

Abstract

Italian law establishes the legal status of social enterprises by providing the accreditation of entities that satisfy the requirements to be a social enterprise. Given the variety of legal forms of social enterprises, the details in the rule of asset lock may vary in the course of their regular operation. The reform of the third sector, which clarifies that social enterprises belong to it, would add to the complexity of the situation In this context, the question of how the asset lock can be used to ensure that there is no drift away from the social purpose of the social enterprise is of paramount concern. This paper will explore four main types of participants in these entities, which are directors, shareholders (or members), third parties, and the controller. To this end, the operation of the asset lock will be dissected by discussing and analyzing the constraints on directors’ remuneration, the principle of the non-distribution of profit motive, restrictions on transactions with third parties in social enterprises, and regulation by the controller during this period of operation, as well as by comparing from a theoretical point of view which of the legal forms of social enterprises would be more conducive to serving the interests of the community and the public interest.

References

  1. Autry Charles T., Roland F. Hall, The Law of Cooperatives. American Bar Association, Section of Business Law, 2009.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  2. Belinfanti Tamara C., „15- Social Lock-In and the Cooperative Form”, [in:] The Cambridge Handbook of Social Enterprise Law, ed. Benjamin Means, Joseph W. Yockey. 256-274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  3. David Hiez, „General Interest Cooperatives: A Challenge for Cooperative Law” International Journal of Cooperative Law, No. 1 (2018): 93-108.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  4. de Nicola Alessandro, Marco Carone, Italian Company Law. EGEA, 2014.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  5. Fici Antonio, „Capitolo 12. Autonomia statutaria e recesso del socio nelle società cooperative”, [in:] Imprese cooperative e sociali: Evoluzione normativa, profili sistematici e questioni applicative. Turin: G. Giappichelli Editore, 2012.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  6. Fici Antonio, „Chapter 9. Italian”, [in:] Principles of European Cooperative Law: Commentaries and National Reports, ed. Gemma Fajardo, Antonio Fici, Hagen Henry, David Hiez, Hans-H. Münkner, Ian Snaith. 347-408. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  7. Fici Antonio, „Social Enterprises and Social Cooperatives in the New Italian Legal Framework for Third Sector Organizations”, [in:] Perspectives on Cooperative Law, ed. Willy Tadjudje, Ifigeneia Douvitsa. 77-88. Singapore: Springer, 2022.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  8. Fici Antonio, „The Social Enterprise in Cooperative Form, Cooperativismo e Economía Social” CES, No. 39 (2016-2017): 31-53.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  9. Fici Antonio, European Social Enterprise Law After the “Social Business Initiative” Communication of 2011: A Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Worker and Social Cooperatives, CECOP, Brussels, 2020.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  10. Hagen Henrÿ, Guidelines for Cooperative Legislation. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2012.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  11. Hansmann Henry, The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.-London: Harvard University Press, 2000. https://doi-org.proxy.bnl.lu/10.4159/9780674038301.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  12. Meloni Sara, „Financial Instruments in Italian Co-Operative Companies” SSRN (2013). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2246443.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.