Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Artykuły

Tom 54 Nr 1 (2025): Prawo i Więź nr 1 (54) 2025

Exploring the Cross-Border Insolvency Laws: A Comparative Study of India and International Perspectives

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI54.1212
Przesłane
8 lutego 2025
Opublikowane
09.05.2025

Abstrakt

Cross-border insolvency involves complex legal challenges that arise when a debtor's assets and liabilities span multiple jurisdictions. The lack of a comprehensive law to deal with such beyond-borders disputes in insolvency can have an undesirable impact on the enterprise, local or foreign creditors, recognition of law or jurisdictions, enforcement of foreign decisions, and many more. In the global context, the United Nations has adopted the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (MLCBI) which has been implemented by various nations like, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Republic of Korea, Japan, Poland, etc. in their domestic laws to create uniformity in administering cross-border insolvency proceedings. This is a guiding document to resolve the legal complexities in cross-border insolvency to the adoptive countries, such as, conflict of laws, determination of assets of debtors, determination of main proceedings, relief provisions and many more. In India, Cross-Border Insolvency proceedings are initiated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. This paper highlights the MLCBI from an Indian Perspective with reference to the IBC, as India’s regulatory framework for cross-border insolvency. Additionally, the paper examines the paradigm shift after the implementation of this MLCBI in the Indian Insolvency Framework in the IBC concerning the proceedings in resolving such international insolvency cases in India. This paper will contribute to how countries like the other countries that have implemented the MLCBI in their legal realm while handling such transnational insolvency disputes.

 

Bibliografia

  1. Deane Felicity, Rosalind Mason, “The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-border Insolvency and the Rule of Law” International Insolvency Review, No. 25 (2016): 138-159.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  2. Franken Sefa M., “Cross-Border Insolvency Law: A Comparative Institutional Analysis” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, No. 34 (2014).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  3. Goswami Debaranjan, Andrew Godwin, “India’s Journey towards Cross-Border Insolvency Law Reform” Asian Journal of Comparative Law, No. 19 (2024).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  4. Hannan Neil, Cross-Border Insolvency The Enactment and Interpretation of the UNCITRAL Model Law (Springer, 2017).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  5. International Monetary Fund, Globalization: A Framework for IMF Involvement, March 2002. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2002/031502.html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  6. Mevorach Irit, “Overlapping International Instruments for Enforcement of Insolvency Judgments: Undermining or Strengthening Universalism?” European Business Organization Law Review, No. 22 (2021).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  7. Ministry of Corporate Affairs Government of India 14, Report of Insolvency Law Committee on Cross Border Insolvency. Government of India, October 2018.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  8. Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Report on the Rules and Regulations for Cross-border Insolvency Resolution. Government of India, June 2020.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  9. Ronald J. Silverman, “Advances in Cross-Border Insolvency Cooperation: the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency” ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, No. 2 (1999).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  10. Wessels Bob, “Modified universalism in European cross-border insolvency?” 9 January 2019. https://bobwessels.nl/blog/2019-01-doc3-modified-universalism-in-european-cross-border-insolvency/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  11. Wolf Annika, “A Global Cross-border Insolvency Framework for Financial Institutions” EUI Working Paper MWP, 1 (2015).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  12. United Nations Commission On International Trade Law, Status: UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (1997), No. 6 (2000). https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/insolvency/modellaw/cross-border_insolvency/status.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  13. Westbrook Jay Lawrence, “A Global Solution to Multinational Default” Michigan Law Review, No. 98 (2000): 2276-2328.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.