Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Tom 54 Nr 1 (2025): Prawo i Więź nr 1 (54) 2025

NATO Collaborative Practices: Political and Legal Regulation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI54.909
Przesłane
3 kwietnia 2024
Opublikowane
09.05.2025

Abstrakt

This paper focuses on the dynamics of cooperative partnerships in the military and defence sector based on NATO’s strategic documents against the background of the rethinking of the global and regional security architecture, increasing hybrid threats and the trend towards strategic autonomy of national subjects. The author proposes examples of cooperative partnerships that represent the transition from multilateralism and multilateral international structures to minilateralism or multi-minilateralism by concluding bilateral agreements in the chosen vector. Ukraine is considered as an alternative model of a regional security platform through coalitions and the signing of agreements in the security dimension.

Bibliografia

  1. Alberque William, „The New NATO Strategic Concept and the end of arms control” International Institute for Strategic Studies, (2022). https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis//2022/06/the-new-nato-strategic-concept-and-the-end-of-arms-control.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  2. Alles Delphine, Fournol Thibault, „Multilateralisms and minilateralisms in the Indo-Pacific” Foundation, No. 9 (2023). www.frstrategie.org/en/publications/recherches-et-documents/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  3. Ansell Chris, Alison Gash, „Collaborative governance in theory and practice” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, No. 18 (2008): 543-71.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  4. Ansell Chris, Alison Gash, „Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, No. 1 (2017): 1-17. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux030.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  5. Belkin Paul, „NATO’s Warsaw Summit: In Brief” Defense Technical Information Center (2016): 16. apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1021858.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  6. Bilal Y. Saab, „Friends with Benefits. What the UAE Really Wants from NATO” Foreign Affairs Snapshot, (2014). www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/middle-east/2014-08-14/friendsbenefits.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  7. Brzezinski Zbigniev, „If Georgia or Ukraine falter, Russia again becomes am empire” Voice of America (2009). www.holosameryky.com/a/a-49-2009-10-13-voa10-86834367/220561.html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  8. Buzan Barry, „A World Without Superpowers: Decentred Globalism” International Relations, No. 25 (2011): 1-23.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  9. Chivvis Christopher S., „NATO’s Southern Exposure. The Real Threats to Europe – and the Alliance” Foreign Affairs Snapshot, (2016). www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2016-04-17/nato-s-southern-exposure.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  10. Chivvis Christopher S., Stephen J. Flanagan, „NATO’s Russia problem: The Alliance’s though a road ahead post” Warsaw Summit. National Interest (2016). nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/natos-russia-problem-the-alliances-tough-road-ahead-post-16952.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  11. Erlanger Steven, „Shifting Attention to Mediterranean, NATO Fights Internal Dissent” New York Times, 16 June 2016. www.nytimes.com/2016/06/17/world/europe/shifting-attention-to-mediterranean-nato-fights-internal-dissent.html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  12. Exartier Vivien, „The future of GCC defense with NATO or as Arab NATO?”, (2019). https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/9812003.html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  13. Gaub Florence, „Against all Odds: Relations between NATO and the MENA Region” Carlisle, PA: United States Army War College – Strategic Studies Institute, August (2012). www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  14. Godzimirski Jakub M., Nina Græger, Kristin M. Haugevik, „Towards a NATO à la Carte? Assessing the Alliance’s Adaptation to New Tasks and Changing Relationships” NUPI-Report, (2011). hdl.handle.net/11250/277248.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  15. Jaffrelot Christophe, „The India Way: Strategies for an Uncertain World’ by Dr S. Jaishankar” Atlantic Council, (2021). https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/southasiasource/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  16. Haas Richard, „The Case for Messy Multilateralism” Financial Times, 2010. www.cfr.org/node/158936.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  17. Harmel Pierre, „Future Tasks of the Alliance”, (1967). www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/80983.htm.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  18. Helwig Niklas, „Germany’s Turn from Reflexive to Strategic Multilateralism” Political Science and Public Policy, No. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800887268.00018.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  19. Henry Etienne, „The Sukhoi Su-24 Incident between Russia and Turkey” Russian Law Journal, No. 4 (2016): 8-25. doi:10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-1-8-25.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  20. Isaac Sally Khalifa, „NATO and Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Security: Prospects for Burden Sharing” NATO Defense College Forum Paper, (2011). www.files.ethz.ch/isn/128708/fp_16.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  21. Kaim Markus, „Reforming NATO’s Partnerships” SWP Research Paper, (2017): 23. www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/research_papers/2017RP01_kim.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  22. Kaim Markus, Hanns W. Maull, Kirsten Westphal, „The Pan-European Order at the Crossroads: Three Principles for a New Beginning” SWP Comments, No. 18 (2015): 8. www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/new-pan-european-order.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  23. Kamp Karl-Heinz, Heidi Reisinger, „NATO’s Partnerships after 2014: Go West!” NATO Defense College, Rome, No.92 (2013): 9. www.jstor.com/stable/resrep10403.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  24. Koka Arnold, „The Gulf Submarine Network amid sabotage and mine warfare threats”, (2022). www.egic.info/gulf-submarine-network-amid-sabotage-mine-warfare.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  25. Krimi Sonia, „NATO and the Mediterranean Security Agenda”, NATO Parliamentary Assembly, (2021). www.nato-pa.int/document/2021-nato-and-mediterranean-security-agenda-krimi-report-021-pcnp-21-e.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  26. Lesser Ian, „The Future of NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue”, The German Marshall Fund, (2018): 38. www.gmfus.org/news/future-natos-mediterranean-dialogue.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  27. Lightfoot Jeff, „NATO Summit Special Series: France” The Atlantic Council, 24 June 2016. www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/nato-summit-special-series-france/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  28. Moret Erika, „Effective Minilateralism for the EU: What, When and How” European Union Institute for Security Studies, (2016). isnblog.ethz.ch/uncategorized/effective-minilateralism-for-the-eu-what-when-and-how.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  29. Moyer Jason, Henri Winberg, „NATO Vilnius Summit 2023: A Summit for Implementation” Wilson Center, (2023). https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/nato-vilnius-summit-2023-summit-implementation.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  30. Naim Moises, „Minilateralism” Foreign Policy, (2009). foreignpolicy. com/2009/06/21/minilateralism/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  31. Noetzel Timo, Schreer Benjamin, „More flexible, less coherent: NATO after Lisbon” Australian Journal of International Affairs, No. 66 (2012): 20-33. doi:10.1080/10357718.2011.637451.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  32. Patrick Stewart, „The new ‘new multilateralism’: Mini‐ lateral cooperation, but at what cost?” Global Summitry, No. 2 (2015): 115–134. globalsummitryproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/New-Multilateralism.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  33. Reichborn-Kjennerud Erik, „NATO in the ‘New’ MENA Region. Competing Priorities amidst Diverging Interests and Financial Austerity” Norwegian Institute of International Affairs – Security in Practice, No. 1 (2013): 20. https://nupi.brage.unit.no/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  34. Samaan Jean-Loup, „NATO in the Gulf: Partnership without a Cause?”, NATO Defense College Research Paper, No. 83 (2012): 8. ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/wps/nat/0031927/f_0031927_25923.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  35. Slaughter Anne-Marie, „Let Europe lead Ukraine” Project Syndicate, (2023). www.project-syndicate.org/magazine/let-europe-lead-in-ukraine.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  36. Tan Seng, „ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting” Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific. 1st Edition, No. 15 (2020): 24. https://www.frstrategie.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  37. Tomkins Richard, „NATO Members Launch Air-to-Ground Precision-guided Weapons Initiative” United Press International, 5 September 2014.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  38. Tirkey Aarshi, „Addressing the inefficacy of multilateralism – Are regional minilaterals the answer?” Observer Research Foundation, 2020. www.orfonline.org/ expert-speak/addressing-inefficacy-multilateralism/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  39. Wieslander Anna, „NATO Turns Its Gaze to the Baltic Region. Sweden Should Make Wise Use of NATO’s Benevolent Attitude to Establish Closer Relations” Euroactiv, (2014). www.euractiv.com/sections/security/nato-turns-its-gazebaltic-region-310962.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  40. Urbanovska Jana, „Minilateral Cooperation in the EU’s Post-Brexit Common Security and Defence Policy: Germany and the Visegrád Countries” Europe-Asia Studies, No. 73 (2022): 402-425. dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2022.2037520.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.