Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Tom 54 Nr 1 (2025): Prawo i Więź nr 1 (54) 2025

The EU Court of Justice in the Process of European Construction and Integration

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI54.978
Przesłane
4 lipca 2024
Opublikowane
09.05.2025

Abstrakt

The paper is devoted to the evolution of the role and place of the Court of Justice in the process of European integration. The author analyses the relationship between the development of primary European legislation, starting with the Treaty of Paris, and the current stage, following the Treaty of Lisbon. The relevant provisions of the founding treaties and the achievements of the case law at each stage and their impact on integration are examined. Their implications for the shaping of trends in the further development of the activity of the CJEU in the context of the current and upcoming challenges are identified.

Bibliografia

  1. Alter Karen J., Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260997.001.0001.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  2. Beach Derek, Martin Mennecke, Between Law and Politics: The Relationship Between the European Court of Justice and EU Member States. København: DJØF Forlag, 2001. https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/en/publications/between-law-and-politics-the-relationship-between-the-european-co.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  3. Boin Arjen, Susanne K. Schmidt, “The European court of justice: Guardian of European integration”, [in:] Guardians of Public Value, edited by Arjen Boin, Lauren A. Fahy, Paul Hart. 135–59. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4_6.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  4. Borysova Valentyna, Kseniia Ivanova, Iryna Iurevych, Olena Ovcharenko, “Judicial protection of civil rights in Ukraine: National experience through the prism of European standards” Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, No. 1 (2019): 66-84. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.1(39).09.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  5. Brack Nathalie, Ramona Coman, Amandine Crespy, “Sovereignty conflicts in the European Union.” Les Cahiers du Cevipol, No. 4 (2019): 3-30. https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-les-cahiers-du-cevipol-2019-4-page-3.html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  6. Chalmers Damian, Luis Barroso, “What Van Gend en Loos stands for” International Journal of Constitutional Law, No. 1 (2014): 105-134. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou003.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  7. Cherniavskyi Serhii, Bohdan Holovkin, Yuliia Chornous, Vasyl Bodnar, Ilona Zhuk, “International cooperation in the field of fighting crime: Directions, levels and forms of realization” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory, No. 3 (2019). https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/16705/1/Holovkin_Cherniavskyi_Chornous_Bodnar_Zhuk_1-11.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  8. Costa Olivier, Nicolas Jabko, Christian Lequesne, Paul Magnette, “The spread of control mechanisms in the European Union: Towards a new form of democracy?” Revue française de science politique, No. 6 (2001): 859-866. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.2001.403681.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  9. Czachor Rafał, „Współpraca Sądu Konstytucyjnego Federacji Rosyjskiej z Europejskim Trybunałem Praw Człowieka w latach 1998-2022” Prawo i Więź, No. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.400.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  10. de Waele Henri, “The Role of the European сourt of justice in the integration process: A contemporary and normative assessment” Hanse Law Review, No. 1 (2010): 3-26. http://hanselawreview.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Vol6No01Art01.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  11. De Witte Bruno, “The impact of van Gend en Loos on judicial protection at European and national level: three types of preliminary questions”, [in:] 50th anniversary of the judgment in van Gend en Loos. 93-101. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-12/qd30136442ac_002.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  12. The Evolution of EU Law (3rd ed.). ed. Craig Paul, Gráinne de Búrca. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846556.001.0001.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  13. Gérard Philippe, Willem Verrijdt, “Belgian Constitutional Court Adopts National Identity Discourse: Belgian Constitutional Court No. 62/2016, 28 April 2016” European Constitutional Law Review, No. 1 (2017): 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019616000444.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  14. Gregosz David, Piotr Womela, Katharina Geschier, Polens Verfassungsgericht bringt Brüssel in Bedrängnis. German: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 2021. https://www.kas.de/documents/252038/10987758/Auf+Kollisionskurs+mit+EU-Recht+-+Polens+Verfassungsgericht+bringt+Br%C3%BCssel+in+Bedr%C3%A4ngnis.pdf/25cdfaa2-4f3f-f4c5-a32f-9d0b068db15a?version=1.0&t=1634633271456.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  15. Koredczuk Józef, “Ewolucja środków i postępowania dowodowego w procesie sądowym ziemskim w Polsce w XVI wieku” Prawo i Więź, No. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI48.756.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  16. Mangold Anna Katharina, “Costa v ENEL (1964): On the importance of contemporary legal history”, [in:] Inter-Trans-Supra? Legal Relations and Power Structures in History, edited by Eliana Augusti, Norman Domeier, Fritz Georg von Graevenitz, Markus J. Prutsch. 220–34. Saarbrücken: AV Akademikerverlag, 2011. https://www.academia.edu/454331/Costa_v_ENEL_1964_On_the_Importance_of_Contemporary_Legal_History.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  17. Sannikov Dmytro, “Problems of land legislation of Ukraine and European union integration” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory, No. 20 (2017). https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jnlolletl20&div=40&id=&page=.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  18. Tamm Ditlev, “The History of the Court of Justice of the European Union Since its Origin”, [in:] The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law, edited by Court of Justice of the European Union. 9-35. The Netherlands, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-897-2_2.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  19. Tomuschat Christian, “Introduction”, [in:] 50th anniversary of the judgment in van Gend en Loos. 49-54. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-12/qd30136442ac_002.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  20. Trykhlib Kristina, “Law-Making activity in the case law of the constitutional court of Ukraine” International and Comparative Law Review, No. 2 (2019): 27-75. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0014.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  21. Werner Benjamin, “Why is the court of justice of the European Union not more contested? Three mechanisms of opposition abatement” JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies No. 6 (2016): 1449–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12438.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  22. Yaroshenko Oleg, Volodymyr Steshenko, Hanna Anisimova, Galina Yakovleva, Mariia Nabrusko, “The impact of the european court of human rights on the development of rights in health care” International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, No. 5 (2021): 501-513. doi:10.1108/IJHRH-03-2021-0078.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.