Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
logo czasopisma

Articles

No. 3 (2024): Law & Social Bonds Nr 4 (50) 2024

UNIFORM CIVIL CODE, LEGAL PLURALISM AND INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF TRIBAL INDIAN WOMEN

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.857
Submitted
February 13, 2024
Published
2024-08-21

Abstract

The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution[1] heralded India as a "Sovereign, Socialist, Secular Democratic Republic". This initiated a constitutional narrative that has sparked ongoing debates and scrutiny regarding the true essence of India's secularism. As the nation approaches the 2024 general elections, the ruling party has discussed the potential implementation of the Uniform Civil Code at the forefront of political discourse. Currently, numerous areas of civil law are regulated by personal laws, encompassing Hindu, Muslim, Christian, and Parsi Law. Notably, communities like Sikhs, Jainas, Buddhists, Dalits, Scheduled Castes, and tribes are categorised as Hindus under the Hindu Personal Laws[2]. The adoption of the Uniform Civil Code is intrinsically linked to the rejection of these personal laws. This raises several questions and contradictions relating to the state of multireligious secular India and its dynamics with the women’s rights movement. The introduction of a Uniform Civil Code limits the nature of legal pluralism in India and can hinder the governance of tribal societies through customary laws. Under the scope of this commentary, the authors discuss the legal pluralism in India and the impact of the introduction of a uniform civil code on customary laws of tribes placing special emphasis on the inheritance rights of tribal women. The paper also discusses the approach of the higher courts in securing property rights for tribal women in the absence of such a   code.

References

  1. Afaq Ahmar, Sukhvinder Singh Dari, „Understanding Uniform Civil Code: Its Need and Challenges” Russian Law Journal, No. 1S (2023), https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i1S.358.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  2. Ahmmed F., „Challenges of Aging and Coping Mechanisms among the Khasi and Garo Tribal Groups: An Ethnographic Observation” Journal of International Social Issues, No. 1 (n.d.): 23-38.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  3. Ambedkar B. R., Vasant Moon, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, 2014.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  4. Ambedkar B. R., Sharmila Rege, Against the Madness of Manu: B.R. Ambedkar’s Writings on Brahmanical Patriarchy. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing Pvt. Ltd, 2013.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  5. Ao Temsula, „Land, Ethics and Economic Management among Ao Nagas” Institute of Northeast India Studies, 1 (2010).
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  6. Das J.N., A Study of Land System in Manipur. Law Research Institute of Guwahati High Court, 1989.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  7. Das Ranga Ranjan, „Gender, Customary Laws and Codification – The North-Eastern Perspectives”, [in:] Gender Implications of Tribal Customary Law: The Case of North-East India. North Eastern Social Research Centre ; Rawat Publications, 2017.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  8. De Sousa Santos Boaventura, „Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law” Journal of Law and Society, No. 3 (1987): 279-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  9. Galanter Marc, „Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, No. 19 (1981): 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756257.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  10. Ghosh Gitanjali, „Gender Preference in Customary Inheritance Laws of the Khasi Tribe in India: Myth or Fact?” SSRN Electronic Journal, (2021), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793397.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  11. Gissel Line Engbo, „Nomos and Narrative in International Criminal Justice” Journal of International Criminal Justice, No. 1 (2022): 117-138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac004.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  12. Griffiths John, „What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24 (1986).
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  13. Hart H. L. A., Leslie Green, Joseph Raz, Penelope A. Bulloch, The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2012.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  14. Hooker Michael Barry, Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  15. Mahanta Aparna, „Understanding Politics of Identity and Ethnicity in North East India: A Gender Perspective”, [in:] In Souvenir: North East India History Association. Dibrugarh, 2008.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  16. Malinowski Bronislaw, Crime and Custom in Savage Society. NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  17. Merry Sally Engle, „Legal Pluralism” Law & Society Review, No. 5 (1988): 869. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  18. Misra Bani Prassana, „Agrarian Relations in a Khasi State” Economic and Political Weekly, No. 20 (1979): 888-892.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  19. Moore Sally Falk, „Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study” Law & Society Review, No. 4 (1973): 719-746. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  20. Mukhim Patricia, „Crisis of Authority in the Khasi Matrilineal Society”, [in:] The Dynamics of Family System in a Matriliny of Meghalaya. Tribal Research Institute, 1999.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  21. Nongbri Tiplut, „Khasi Women and Matriliny: Transformations in Gender Relations” Gender, Technology and Development, No. 3 (2000): 359-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2000.11909976.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  22. Pakyntein Valentina, „Gender Preference in Khasi Society: An Evaluation of Tradition, Change and Continuity” Indian Anthropologist, Indian Anthropological Association, 30 (2000): 27-35.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  23. Pal Samaraditya, Deepan Kumar Sarkar, India’s Constitution: Origins and Evolution: Constituent Assembly Debates, Lok Sabha Debates on Constitutional Amendments and Supreme Court Judgments. Gurgaon, Haryana, India: LexisNexis, 2017.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  24. Pospisil Leopold, Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York Evanston San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1971.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  25. Rajak Komal, „Trajectories of Women’s Property Rights in India: A Reading of the Hindu Code Bill” Contemporary Voice of Dalit, No. 1 (2020): 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X19898420.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  26. Rivers W. H. R., Social Organisation. Stephen, Austin & Sons Ltd., 1924.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  27. Singh Jyoti, Kajori Bhatnagar, „Evaluating the Categorical Exclusion of Khasi Women from Inheritance and Property Rights: A Case of East Khasi Hills” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 30 January (2024): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10143.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  28. Singh M. P., „On Uniform Civil Code, Legal Pluralism And The Constitution Of India” Journal of Indian Law and Society, Vol. V (2014).
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  29. Tamahana Brain Z., „Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global” Sydney Law Review, 29 (2007).
    Show in Google Scholar -->>
  30. Woodman Gordon R., „Ideological Combat and Social Observation: Recent Debate about Legal Pluralism” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, No. 42 (1998): 21-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1998.10756513.
    Show in Google Scholar -->>

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.