Pasek boczny artykułu

Przesłane
2 stycznia 2024
Opublikowane
21 sierpnia 2024
Pobieranie
Gredka
Statystyczny
Read Counter : 93 Pobieranie : 45

Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

This paper examines the civil liability of AI systems in EU legislation. The analysis discusses current problems with AI liability, proposals of the European Union legislator on how to solve existing problems and includes de lege ferenda suggestions. The observations’ conclusions allow us to answer whether the legal solutions offered by the Products Liability Directive proposal and the AI Liability Directive proposal are adequate to the identified problems with the liability of AI systems.

Słowa kluczowe

artificial intelligence AI systems AI liability fault-based liability product liability strict liability EU legislation artificial intelligence AI systems AI liability fault-based liability product liability strict liability EU legislation

Szczegóły artykułu

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Biogram autora

Iwona Gredka-Ligarska - University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Law and Administration

Iwona Gredka-Ligarska – an Attorney, PhD in jurisprudence and an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland). Member of the Labour Law and Social Policy Research Team. Laureate of the OPUS-21 competition organized by the Polish National Science Center. Specialist in civil law, labour law and cultural heritage protection law. Author of numerous scientific publications and a participant in national and international scientific conferences.

Referencje

  1. Fairgrieve Duncan, Geraint Howells, Peter Møgelvang-Hansen, Gert Straetmans, Dimitri Verhoeven, Piotr MacHnikowski, André Janssen, Reiner Schulze, „Product Liability Directive”, [in:] European Product Liability: An Analysis of the State of the Art in the Era of New Technologies, ed. Piotr Machnikowski. 46. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2016.
  2. Gerstner Maruerite E., „Liability Issues with Artificial Intelligence Software” Santa Clara Law Review, No. 1 (1993): 239-269. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss1/7/.
  3. Gilead Israel, „Product Liability in Israel”, [in:] European Product Liability: An Analysis of the State of the Art in the Era of New Technologies, ed. Piotr Machnikowski. 546–547. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2016.
  4. Jagielska Monika, „Odpowiedzialność za sztuczną inteligencję [Liability for Artificial Intelligence]”, [in:] Prawo sztucznej inteligencji [The Law of Artificial Intelligence], ed. Luigi Lai, Marek Świerczyński. 69-79. Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2020,
  5. Jagielska Monika, Odpowiedzialność za produkt [Product Liability]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2009.
  6. Lior Anat, „AI Strict Liability Vis-à-Vis AI Monopolization” Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, No. 1 (2020): 90-126. https://doi.org/10.52214/stlr.v22i1.8055.
  7. European Product Liability: An Analysis of the State of the Art in the Era of New Technologies, ed. Piotr Machnikowsk. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2016.
  8. Masci Pietro, „The History of Insurance: Risk, Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship” Journal of the Washington Institute of China Studies No. 3 (2011): 25-68. https://www.academia.edu/45474658/The_History_of_Insurance_Risk_Uncertainty_and_Entrepreneurship.
  9. Radwański Zbigniew, Zobowiązania – część ogólna [Obligations – General], 2nd ed. Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 1998.
  10. Rojszczak Marcin, Marcin Rojszczak, „Prawne aspekty systemów sztucznej inteligencji. Zarys problemu [Legal Aspects of Artificial Intelligence Systems: Outline of the Problem]”, [in:] Sztuczna inteligencja, blockchain, cyberbezpieczeństwo oraz dane osobowe. Zagadnienia wybrane [Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Cybersecurity and Personal Data: Selected Issues], ed. Kinga Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Jacek Gołaczyński, Dariusz Szostek. 1-22. Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2019.
  11. Russell Stuart, Human Compatible: AI and the Problem of Control. UK, USA, Canada, Ireland, Australia, India, New Zealand, South Africa: Penguin Books, 2019.
  12. Smuha Nathalie A., Emma Ahmed-Rengers, Adam Harkens, Wenlong Li, James MacLaren, Riccardo Piselli, Karen Yeung. How the EU Can Achieve Legally Trustworthy AI: A Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3899991.
  13. Swanson Greg, „Non-Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Programs and Products Liability: How New Al Products Challenge Existing Liability Models and Pose New Financial Burdens” Seattle University Law Review, No. 3 (2019): 1201-1222. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol42/iss3/11/.
  14. Sykes Alan O., „The Law and Economics of «Forced» Technology Transfer and Its Implications for Trade and Investment Policy (and the U.S.–China Trade War)” Journal of Legal Analysis, No. 1 (2021): 127-171.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa007.
  15. Veale Michael, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, „Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach” Computer Law Review International No. 4 (2021): 97-112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402.
  16. Vladeck David C., „Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence” Washington Law Review, No. 1 (2014): 117-150. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol89/iss1/6.
  17. Wendehorst Christiane, „Strict Liability for AI and other Emerging Technologies” Journal of European Tort Law, No. 2 (2020): 179. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2020-0140.