Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Artykuły

Tom 60 Nr 1 (2026): Prawo i Więź

Class Actions in Environment Disputes: Lessons from the United States and Prostects in Vietnam

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/s10xbz09
Przesłane
5 grudnia 2025
Opublikowane
19-02-2026

Abstrakt

Decision No. 1658/QD-TTg dated October 1, 2021, of the Prime Minister approving the National Strategy on Green Growth for the 2021-2030 period, with a vision to 2050, has identified the green economy as a strategic orientation that Vietnam must aim for. To ensure the success of this strategy, the State must use many tools as driving forces, such as finance, technology, communication, and education, and especially indispensable legal tools. The law, on one hand, must have a guiding effect through regulations paving the way to encourage investment and development, and, on the other hand, must have a higher deterrent effect through strengthening and ›facilitating litigation mechanisms towards sustainable environmental protection. A class action is a legal mechanism that allows a group of people with similar interests to jointly sue a defendant through common representation. This model is particularly effective in environmental cases, where the damage is often widespread and affects a large community. In some countries, class action with an opt-out mechanism has been recognized for a long time, but in Vietnam, the current law has not yet fully recognized the right class action mechanism, especially in the environmental field. In fact, the 2015 Civil Procedure Code and the 2020 Environmental Protection Law have some fundamental provisions on collective lawsuits that, however, need to be improved. Learning from the United States’ legal model will help Vietnam perfect the class action model in the future, aiming to protect the environment more effectively and fairly. The paper uses the methods of analysis, comparison, and synthesis to achieve the above research objectives.

Bibliografia

  1. Behrens Mark, “Third Party Litigation Funding: A Call for Disclosure and Other Reforms to Address the Stealthy Financial Product That Is Transforming the Civil Justice System” Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, No. 1 (2024): 1-30.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  2. Do Hung, ”Around the Vedan Case: Justice has Won” People's Police Newspaper, 12 August 2010. https://cand.com.vn/Kinh-te-Van-hoa-The-Thao/Xung-quanh-vu-kien-Vedan-Cong-ly-da-chien-thang-i299120/.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  3. Duyen Hai, “Chief Justice of Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court: Many Pending Cases Due to Judges Fearing Incorrect Rulings” VNExpress, 30 July 2015. https://vnexpress.net/chanh-an-tand-tp-hcm-an-dong-nhieu-do-tham-phan-so-xu-sai-3256261.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  4. “Environmental Pollution Remains a Big Challenge for Hanoi” Vietnam News, 7 June 2024. https://vietnamnews.vn/environment/1657026/environmental-pollution-remains-big-challenge-for-ha-noi.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  5. “Formosa blamed for fish death” Vietnam News, 30 June 2016. https://vietnamnews.vn/society/298928/formosa-blamed-for-fish-death.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  6. Hensler Debora, “The Globalization of Class Actions” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 622 (2009): 7-29.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  7. Hieu Chi, Anh Vu, “How is the 500 Million USD Compensation for Formosa Spent?” Thanh Nien Newspaper, 2 July 2017. https://thanhnien.vn/500-trieu-usd-formosa-den-bu-duoc-chi-the-nao-185573478.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  8. Hoan Khanh, “The Court Returns 506 Formosa Petitions of People” Thanh Nien Newspaper, 18 October 2016. https://thanhnien.vn/toa-an-tra-lai-506-don-khoi-kien-formosa-cua-nguoi-dan-185599236.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  9. Holtzman Emily, “Widening the Power Gap: The Eighth Circuit’s Stringent Requirement for Class Actions in Environmental Contamination Cases” Missouri Law Review, No. 2 (2019): 537-560.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  10. Nguyen Minh Duc, “It’s Time for a Class Action Lawsuit” Thanh Nien Newspaper, 19 October 2019. https://thanhnien.vn/da-den-luc-phai-co-khoi-kien-tap-the-185893351.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  11. Nguyen Van Tien, “Discussing the Authorization to Initiate Lawsuits in Civil Procedures” Electronic People's Court Magazine, 8 February 2023. https://tapchitoaan.vn/ban-ve-uy-quyen-khoi-kien-trong-to-tung-dan-su7980.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  12. Pellegrini Francesca, Understanding Litigation Funding: Comparative Perspectives on Regulation, Market Behaviour and Economic Consequences. Milano: Angeli, 2025.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  13. Pham Van Vo, Lecture on Environmental Law. National Political Publishing House, 2023.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  14. Pratt Angela, Ramla Khalidi, Vietnam’s Heavy Air Pollution Needs Stronger Action. https://www.undp.org/vietnam/blog/viet-nams-heavy-air-pollution-needs-stronger-action.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  15. Raymond Marcin, “Searching for the Origin of the Class Action” Catholic University Law Review, 23 (1974).
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  16. Scott Dodson, “An Opt-in Option for Class Actions” Michigan Law Review, No. 2 (2016): 171-214.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  17. Selma Mezetovic Medic, “Collective Redress is There Way for Both Opt–In and Opt–Out?” South East European Law Journal, 9 (2022): 62-81.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  18. Thuy Dung, “Vietnam on Path to Achieve Its Net-Zero Emissions Goal” Governmental News, 30 November 2023. https://en.baochinhphu.vn/viet-nam-on-path-to-achieve-its-net-zero-emissions-goal-111231130152207843.html.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  19. Vu Thu Hanh, Environmental Law Textbook. Vietnam National University of Hanoi Press, 2021.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.