In its resolution of 6 May 2022, III CZP 47/22, the Supreme Court confronted the problem of the possibility of a cooperative member appointing a proxy to participate in a member class meeting. Doubts are raised by the justification of the resolution and how the Supreme Court argued on the way to its conclusion about the personal nature of a cooperative member’s participation in a meeting of a member class. According to the author, the objection to the Resolution might be the lack of consideration in the thesis of the scope of statutory autonomy expressed in Article 59 § 1 sentence 2 of the Cooperative Law.