Pasek boczny artykułu

Przesłane
21 grudnia 2022
Opublikowane
25 marca 2024
Pobieranie
pdf
Statystyczny
Read Counter : 56 Pobieranie : 30

Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

W pracy poddano analizie i interpretacji historycznie ukształtowane rozwiązania normatywne rękojmi za wady fizyczne zwierząt w wybranych mieszanych systemach prawnych: Szkocji, Luizjany, Quebecku i Południowej Afryki. Wykazano w ujęciu historycznoprawnym i komparatystycznym zarówno trafne, jak i niekorzystne próby reakcji prawnej na ponadczasowy problem występowania chorób sprzedawanych zwierząt żywych. Wskazano jakie schematy hybrydyzacji prawa cywilnego w przedmiotowym zakresie mogą być przyjmowane w przyszłości.

Słowa kluczowe

komparatystyka, prawo cywilne, historia prawa, medycyna weterynaryjna comparative law, civil law, legal history, veterinary medicine

Szczegóły artykułu

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Referencje

  1. Aquilina Kevin, „Rethinking Maltese Hybridity: A Chimeric Illusion or a Healthy Grafted European Law Mixture?” Journal of Civil Law Studies, nr 2 (2011): 261-283.
  2. Aquilina Kevin, „The Nature and Sources of the Maltese Mixed Legal System: A Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde?” Comparative Law Review, nr 1 (2013): 1-38.
  3. Attwooll Elspeth, The Tapestry of the Law: Scotland, Legal Culture and Legal Theory. Dordrecht: Springer, 1997.
  4. lord Bankton Andrew McDouall, An Institute of the Laws of Scotland in Civil Rights: with Observations upon the Agreement or Diversity Between them and the Laws of England. Edinburgh: Fleming, Kincaid & Donaldson, 1751-1753.
  5. Bell George J., Commentaries on the Law of Scotland and on the Principles
  6. of Mercantile Jurisprudence, t. I-II. Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1990.
  7. Bussani Mauro, Vernon V. Palmer, „The Liability Regimes of Europe – Their Façades and Interiors”, [w:] Pure Economic Loss in Europe. The Common Core of European Private Law, red. Mauro Bussani, Vernon V. Palmer. 120-162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  8. Cycero Marek Tulliusz, „De oratore”, [w:] M. Tulli Ciceronis De Oratore Libri Tres, with Introduction and Notes, red. Augustus S. Wilkins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1902-1961.
  9. Dickinson John A., „New France: Law, Courts, and the Coutume De Paris, 1608-1760” Manitoba Law Journal, nr 23 (1995): 32-54.
  10. Dzikowski Andrzej, „Morbus est… Roman Views on Health of Animals as a Basis for the Present-Day Warranty Legislation” Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, nr 4 (2020): 429-442.
  11. Erskine of Carnock, John. An Institute of the Law of Scotland. Edinburgh: Legal Education Trust, 2014.
  12. Evans-Jones Robin, „Receptions of Law, Mixed Legal Systems and the Myth of the Genius of Scots Private Law” Law Quarterly Review, nr 114 (1998): 228-249.
  13. Evans-Jones Robin, „The Actio Quanti Minoris in Mixed Legal Systems”, [w:] Roman Law as Formative of Modern Legal Systems, t. I, red. Janusz Sondel, Jarosław Reszczyński i Piotr Ściślicki. 79-92. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2003.
  14. Fernandez Mark F., From Chaos to Continuity: the Evolution of Louisiana’s Judicial System, 1712-1862. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001.
  15. Gordon William M., „Risk in Sale – from Roman to Scots Law”, [w:] Roman Law as Formative of Modern Legal Systems, t. I, red. Janusz Sondel, Jarosław Reszczyński, Piotr Ściślicki. 115-124. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2003.
  16. Hatzimihail Nikitas E., „Cyprus as a Mixed Legal System” Journal of Civil Law Studies, nr 1 (2013): 37-96.
  17. Anthony M. Honoré, „The History of the Aedilitian Actions from Roman to Roman-Dutch Law”, [w:] Studies in the Roman Law of Sale Dedicated to the Memory of Francis de Zulueta, red. David Daube. 136-158. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.
  18. Hood John T., „The History and Development of the Louisiana Civil Code” Louisiana Law Review, nr 1 (1958): 18-33.
  19. Johnston David, „Sale and Transfer of Title in Roman and Scots Law”, [w:] The Roman Law Tradition, red. Andrew D. E. Lewis, David J. Ibbetson. 182-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  20. Kaser Max, „Das römische Recht in Südafrika” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, nr 81 (1964): 1-30.
  21. Lévy-Ullmann Henri, „The Law of Scotland” Juridical Review, nr 37 (1925): 370-390.
  22. MacQueen Hector L., „Mixed Jurisdictions and Convergence: Scotland” International Journal of Legal Information, nr 29 (2001): 309-322.
  23. McClelland Paul, The Seller’s Liability for Sale of Faulty Goods in Scots Law. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 2015.
  24. Örücü Esin, „What is a Mixed Legal System: Exclusion or Expansion?” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, nr 1 (2008): 1-18.
  25. Örücü Esin, Elspeth Attwooll, Sean Coyle, Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing. The Hague-London-Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996.
  26. Palmer Vernon V., Louisiana: Microcosm of a Mixed Jurisdiction. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1999.
  27. Palmer Vernon V., Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family. Cambridge: University Press, 2001.
  28. Palmer Vernon V., Elspeth Ch. Reid, Mixed Jurisdictions Compared: Private Law in Louisiana and Scotland. Edinburgh: University Press, 2009.
  29. Parise Agustin, „A Constant Give and Take: Tracing Legal Borrowings in the Louisiana Civil Law Experience” Seton Hall Legislative Journal, nr 1 (2010): 1-35.
  30. du Plessis Jacques, „The Promises and Pitfalls of Mixed Legal Systems: the South African and Scottish experiences” Stellenbosch Law Review, nr 3 (1998): 338-343.
  31. Reid Kenneth, „The »Actio Quanti Minoris« and Conveyancing Practice” Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, nr 33 (1988): 285-287.
  32. Reid Kenneth, „The Idea of Mixed Legal Systems” Tulane Law Review, nr 78 (2003): 5-40.
  33. Reid Kenneth, Reinhard Zimmermann, A History of Private Law in Scotland, t. I-II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  34. Rousseau-Houle Thérèse, Précis du droit de la vente et du louage. Québec: Presses Université Laval, 1986.
  35. Sellar William D.H., „Scots Law: Mixed from the Very Beginning? A Tale of Two Receptions” Edinburgh Law Review, nr 1 (2000): 3-18.
  36. Smith Thomas B., Studies Critical and Comparative. Edinburgh: Green & Son, 1962.
  37. Smits Jan M., „European Private Law as a Mixed Legal System” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, nr 5 (1998): 328-340.
  38. Smits Jan M., „The Harmonisation of Private Law in Europe: Some Insights from Evolutionary Theory” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, nr 31 (2002): 79-99.
  39. Smits Jan M., The Making of European Private Law: Toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a Mixed Legal System. Antwerpen-Oxford-New York: Intersentia, 2002.
  40. viscount Stair Dalrymple James, The Institutions of the Law of Scotland. Edinburgh-Glasgow: The University Presses, 1981.
  41. Stein Peter, Fault in the Formation of Contract in Roman Law and Scots Law. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1958.
  42. Symeonides Symeon, „The Mixed Legal System of the Republic of Cyprus” Tulane Law Review, nr 78 (2003): 441-442.
  43. Tetley William, „Mixed Jurisdictions: Common Law vs. Civil Law (Codified and Uncodified)” Uniform Law Review, nr 4 (1999): 677-738.
  44. Thomson Joe M., „Legal Change and Scots Private Law”, [w:] Critical Studies in Ancient Law. Comparative Law and Legal History: Essays in Honour of Alan Watson, red. John Cairns, Olivia Robinson. 379-391. Oxford: Hart, 2001.
  45. Thomson Stephen, „Mixed Jurisdiction and the Scottish Legal Tradition: Reconsidering the Concept of Mixture” Journal of Civil Law Studies, nr 1 (2014): 51-91.
  46. de Wet Johannes Ch., Andreas H. van Wyk, Die Suid-Afrikaanse Kontraktereg en Handelsreg, t. I, Durban: Butterworths, 1992.
  47. Zimmermann Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
  48. Zimmermann Reinhard, „Common law und ius commune. Unkodifizierte Mischrechtsordnungen im Vergleich”, [w:] Aufbruch nach Europa. 75 Jahre Max-Planck-Institut für Privatrecht, red. Jürgen Basedow, Ulrich Drobnig, Reinhard Ellger, Klaus J. Hopt, Hein Kötz, Rainer Kulms. 852-854. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.
  49. Zimmermann Reinhard, Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law. The Civilian Tradition Today. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
  50. Zimmermann Reinhard, Daniel Visser. Southern Cross. Civil Law and Common Law in South Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
  51. Zweigert Konrad, Hein Kötz. An Introduction to Comparative Law. The framework. Amsterdam-New York-Oxford: University Press, 1977.