Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Artykuły

Nr 1 (44) (2023)

Health Law Implications of the Use of Blockchain Technology

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi44.541
Przesłane
12 października 2022
Opublikowane
20.04.2023

Abstrakt

Code is the human-made architecture of cyberspace, and thus technology can be used to control individual behavior. It imposes systematic limits on the individual's behavior in an artificial environment, thus we can apostrophize the code designer as the rule maker of the technological environment – such as the Internet or digital platforms. The nature of blockchain technology makes regulation through code extremely powerful and decisive: the tamper-proof nature of the distributed ledger and the possibility to automate transactions make the so-called lex cryptographia an effective regulatory code. At the same time, a significant circumstance from the point of view of our topic is that the lex cryptographia is also subject to external regulation – consisting of real legislation – which it must fully comply with during its operation. The relationship between the two regulatory levels can be determined not by substitution, but by supplementing each other. In this study, based on the international literature and various case studies, I examine the conditions under which blockchain technology can be used in the health care provider system and the legal implications of this in everyday life.

Bibliografia

  1. Agnikhotram Sai, Antonios Kouroutakis, „Doctrinal Challenges for the Legality of Smart Contracts: Lex Cryptographia or a New, Smart Way to Contract” Journal of High Technology Law, No. 2 (2019): 300-328.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  2. Árpási Zoltán, „A blokklánc alkalmazásának lehetőségei az egészségügyben” Cryptofalka, 29 December 2019.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  3. https://cryptofalka.hu/blokklanc-egeszsegugyi-alkalmazasa/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  4. Becker Katrin, „Blockchain Matters – Lex Cryptographia and the Displacement of Legal Symbolics and Imaginaries” Law and Critique, 33 (2022): 113-130. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10978-021-09317-8.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  5. Bennett Kathryn M., „HealthTech: How Blockchain Can Simplify Healthcare Compliance” Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, No. 1 (2018): 287-314.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  6. Berson Dave, Susan Berson, „Blockchain Law 101: Understanding Blockchain Technology and the Applicable Law” Journal of the Kansas Bar Association, No. 2. (2019): 40-43.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  7. Brewer Clay, „Help Us, Help You: Big Tech and the Future of Personal Health Records” Belmont Health Law Journal, 3 (2019): 74-116.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  8. Chang Josephine, Alek Emery, „Blockchain Patentability 101” Los Angeles Lawyer, No. 6 (2019): 20-25.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  9. CNIL, Solutions for a Responsible use of the Blockchain in the Context of Personal Data. September 2018; https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/blockchain_en.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  10. Connor-Green Devon S., „Blockchain in Healthcare Data” Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, No. 2 (2017): 93-108.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  11. De Caria Riccardo, „Blockchain and Smart Contracts: Legal Issues and Regulatory Responses between Public and Private Economic Law” Italian Law Journal, No. 1 (2020): 363-379.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  12. De Filippi Primavera, Aaron Wright. Blockchain and the Law – The Rule of Code. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2019.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  13. DHL: DHL and Accenture Unlock the Power of Blockchain in Logistics. Bonn, Germany, 03/12/2018; https://www.dhl.com/global-en/home/press/press-archive/2018/dhl-and-accenture-unlock-the-power-of-blockchain-in-logistics.html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  14. Dimitropoulos Georgios, „The Law of Blockchain” Washington Law Review, No. 3 (2020): 1117-1192.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  15. Duisberg Alexander, Smart Contracts and the Law. Presentation. Münchner Kreis – Blockchain Conference, 23 November 2017. https://www.muenchner-kreis.de/wp-content/uploads/fileadmin/dokumente/_pdf/20171123/Duisberg_20171123_MKreis_Blockchain_Dr._Alexander_Duisberg_final.PDF.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  16. Ethereum, Oracles, 6 May 2022. https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/oracles/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  17. Exyte, How Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Benefits From Smart Contracts in 2020. https://exyte.com/blog/how-pharmaceutical-supply-chain-benefits-from-smart-contracts.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  18. Finck Michèle, „Blockchains and Data Protection in the European Union” European Data Protection Law Review, No. 1 (2018): 17-35. https://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/edpl/2018/1/6/display/html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  19. Gillis Alexander S., „What is the Internet of Things (IoT)?” Techtarget, March 2022.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  20. https://www.techtarget.com/iotagenda/definition/Internet-of-Things-IoT.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  21. Interpol, Fake Medicines. https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Illicit-goods/Shop-safely/Fake-medicines.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  22. Johnson Walter G., „Blockchain Meets Genomics: Governance Considerations for Promoting Food Safety and Public Health” Journal of Food Law and Policy, No. 1 (2019): 74-97.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  23. Krawiec R.J., Dan Housman, Mark White, Mariya Filipova, Florian Quarre, Dan Barr, Allen Nesbitt, Kate Fedosova, Jason Killmeyer, Adam Israel, Lindsay Tsai. Blockchain: Opportunities for Health Care. Deloitte, August 2016.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  24. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/public-sector/us-blockchain-opportunities-for-health-care.pdf.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  25. Leck Andy, Ren Jun Lim, „A Peek into the Health Tech Boom” Managing Intellectual Property, 251 (2015): 33-35.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  26. Lingwall Jeff, Ramya Mogallapu, „Should Code Be Law? Smart Contracts, Blockchain, and Boilerplate” UMKC Law Review, No. 2 (2019): 285-322.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  27. Mi az a blokklánc? Átfogó útmutató és jövőbeli alkalmazási területei. https://www.bitcoinbazis.hu/utmutato/blokklanc-utmutato/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  28. Móray Gábor, „Mi az a blokklánc technológia és milyen lehetőségeket kínál?” Computerworld, 28 Octtober 2020.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  29. https://computerworld.hu/tech/mi-az-a-blokklanc-technologia-es-milyen-lehetosegeket-kinal-285890.html.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  30. Nadimi Peter, Samuel G. Korver, Zach Smolinski, Lauren M. W. Steinhaeuser, Corey Bieber, „Practicing Blockchain Law [comments] Panel III” John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law, No. 1 (2019): 52-73.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  31. OECD, „Opportunities and Challenges of Blockchain Technologies in Health Care” Blockchain Policy Series (December 2020).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  32. Quintais Joao Pedro, Balazs Bodo, Alexandra Giannopoulou, Valeria Ferrari, „Blockchain and the Law: A Critical Evaluation” Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, No. 1 (2019): 86-112.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  33. Pena Daniel, „Blockchain and Data Protection: Health Patients Records in Colombia” International Journal for the Data Protection Officer, Privacy Officer and Privacy Counsel, No. 6 (2019): 29-31.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  34. Rauland Marco, Are You Smart Enough? Blockchain & Smart Contract Applications in Pharma. 10.02.2022; https://pharmaboardroom.com/articles/are-you-smart-enough-blockchain-smart-contract-applications-in-pharma/.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  35. Rejeb Abderahman, Horst Treiblmaie, Karim Rejeb, Suhaiza Zailani, „Blockchain Research in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Review and Current Research Trends” Journal of Data, Information, and Management, 3 (2021): 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-021-00046-2.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  36. Saunderson Doreen, Margaret Mrazek, „High Tech Medical Advances and the Health Law Labyrinth” Law Now, No. 6 (1990): 8-11.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  37. Scheuer Eberhard, „Blockchain Solves Healthcare Data Obstacles” Health Management, No. 1 (2019).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  38. https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/issuearticle/blockchain-solves-healthcare-data-obstacles.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  39. Schrepel Thibault, Anarchy, „State, and Blockchain Utopia: Rule of Law versus Lex Cryptographia” Social Science Research Network, 12 November 2019. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3485436.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  40. Stines Robert A., „Blockchain 101: A Lawyer’s (Brief) Guide” Tort Source (2019): 14-15.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  41. Tarcsi Ádám, László Sas, Bálint Molnár, Zénó Szabó, SAP NetWeaver alkalmazásfejlesztés. Budapest: ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kar, 2012.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  42. Van Eecke Patrick, Anne-Gabrielle Haie, „Blockchain and the GDPR: The EU Blockchain Observatory Report” European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), No. 4 (2018): 531-534.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  43. Werbach Kevin, „Trust, but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law” Berkeley Technology Law Journal, No. 2 (2018): 487-550.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  44. Wright Aaron, Primavera De Filippi. Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia Social Science Research Network, 10 March 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  45. Wright Steven, Technical and Legal Challenges for Healthcare Blockchains and Smart Contracts. Atlanta: Presentation. ITU Kaleidoscope, 2019.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  46. Yeung Karen, „Regulation by Blockchain: The Emerging Battle for Supremacy Between the Code of Law and Code as Law” Modern Law Review, No. 2 (2019): 207-239.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.