Proceedings to secure claims are accessory to exploratory proceedings, but they help to ensure the feasibility of enforcing the issued decision. Hence, the security granted ensures the subsequent enforceability of the issued ruling. Hence, its collapse should follow from the applicable regulations. In Article 7541 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure there is no regulation analogous to Article 7541 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the form of a premise for the collapse of the security in the absence of a court order that specifies the time limit for the collapse of the security differently from the statutory regulation. Doubts arise as to whether a judicial modification of the one-month deadline is possible, which is reflected in the legal question presented to the Supreme Court and draws attention to the interpretative doubts that will be analyzed.