logo czasopisma

Articles

Vol. 59 No. 6 (2025): Law and Social Bonds no. 6 (vol. 59) 2025

Limitations of Exploitation of Works in Machine Learning. Copyright Infringement vs. Permitted Use in the Scope of TDM

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/921e9918
Submitted
17 December 2024
Published
23-12-2025

Abstract

The main subject of analysis undertaken in this paper is the question of whether the current state of the law leads to an appropriate balance between the interests of creators and the economic development of countries. To this end, an in-depth analysis of Articles 3 and 4 of the DSM directive on the training of artificial intelligence systems was carried out. As part of the paper, the question of the requirement for legal access was raised and the meaning of the opt-out clause was discussed. The final section of the paper presents a comparative legal study of the United States' legal system. It answers the question of whether previous Polish regulations relating to the DSM Directive sufficiently protected creators before the amendment.

References

  1. Bagieńska-Masiota Aleksandra, „Dozwolony użytek w zakresie eksploracji tekstów i danych w świetle Dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2019/790” Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis | Studia De Cultura, nr 1 (2022): 118-128. https://doi.org/10.24917/20837275.14.1.8.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Bałos Iga, „Trenowanie wybranych modeli sztucznej inteligencji a uprawnienia twórców” Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały, nr 2 (2019): 15-28.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Błeszyński Jan, Prawo autorskie, Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Fernández-Molina Juan Carlos, Fernando Esteban de la Rosa, „Copyright and Text and Data Mining: Is the Current Legislation Sufficient and Adequate?” Portal. Libraries and the Academy, nr 3 (2024): 653-672.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Flegel Aleksandra, „Powstanie nowych pól eksploatacji utworów i ich wpływ na treść umów prawnoautorskich w perspektywie prawnoporównawczej” Folia Iuridica Universitatis Wratislaviensis, nr 2 (2021): 42-54. https://doi.org/10.34616/141808.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Gisburg Jane. C., „Fair Use in The United States: Transformed, Deformed, Reformed?” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (2020): 265-294.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Griffiths Jonathan, Tatiana Eleni Synodinou, Raquel Xalabarder, „Comment of the European Copyright Society Addressing Selected Aspects of the Implementation of Articles 3 to 7 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market” European Copyright Society, 3 maja 2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Have I Been Trained? Frequently Asked Questions. https://haveibeentrained.com.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Keller Paul, „A First Look at the Copyright Relevant Parts in the Final AI Act Compromise” Kluwer Copyright Blog, 11 grudzień, 2023. https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2023/12/11/a-first-look-at-the-copyright-relevant-parts-in-the-final-ai-act-compromise/.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Keller Paul, „Machine Readable or not? – Notes on the Hearing in LAION e.v. vs. Kneschke”. Kluwer Copyright Blog, 22 lipca 2024. https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2024/07/22/machine-readable-or-not-notes-on-the-hearing-in-laion-e-v-vs-kneschke/.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Kretschmer Martin, Thomas Margoni, Pinar Oruçs, „Copyright Law, and the Lifecycle of Machine Learning Models” IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, nr 1 (2024): 110-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01419-3.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Kunc-Urbańczyk Karina, „Uczenie maszynowe jako pole eksploatacji utworu”, [w:] Prawo sztucznej inteligencji i nowych technologii, red. Bogdan Fischer, Adam Pązik, Marek Świerczyński. 211-240. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Kupiec Mateusz, „Amerykański fair use i japoński non-enjoyment – drogowskazy dla europejskich rozwiązań prawnych w zakresie TDM?” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, nr 2 (2021): 134-146.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Kusuma Fauzan Eka, Rahmi Rahmi, „The Use of Shadow Libraries at Universitas Indonesia”. First Monday, nr 10 (2023): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i10.12947.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Lindberg Matthew, „Applying Current Copyright Law to Artificial Intelligence Image Generators in the Context of Anderson v. Stability AI, Ltd.” Mitchell Hamline School of Law, nr 1 (2024): 38-62.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Manteghi Maryna, „Can Text and Data Mining Exceptions and Synthetic Data Training Mitigate Copyright-Related Concerns in Generative AI?” Law, Innovation and Technology, nr 2 (2024): 663-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2024.2392928.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Margoni Thomas, “Saving Research: Lawful Access to Unlawful Sources Under Art. 3 CDSM Directive?” Kluwer Copyright Blog, 22 grudzień, 2023. https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2023/12/22/saving-research-lawful-access-to-unlawful-sources-under-art-3-cdsm-directive/.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Markiewicz Ryszard, „ChatGPT a prawo Unii Europejskiej” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, nr 2 (2023): 143-171.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Markiewicz Ryszard, Prawo autorskie na jednolitym rynku cyfrowym: Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2019/790. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Nowakowski Michał, Sztuczna inteligencja. Praktyczny przewodnik dla sektora innowacji finansowych. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2023.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Traple Elżbieta, „Granice eksploracji tekstów i danych na potrzeby maszynowego uczenia się przez systemy sztucznej inteligencji”, [w:] Prawo sztucznej inteligencji i nowych technologii, red. Bogdan Fischer, Adam Pązik, Marek Świerczyński. 24-25. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Traple Elżbieta, „Komentarz do art. 50”, [w:] Komentarz do ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych, red. Ryszard Markiewicz, Janusz Barta, teza 3. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2011. Lex.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Tylec Grzegorz, Sebastian Kwiecień, Łukasz. Sadowski, „Is It Possible to License Works Used in the Learning Process of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms?”: 1–19.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. VentureBeat, „OpenAI will Release a Media Manager Tool in 2025, Allowing Creators to Block AI Training”. https://venturebeat.com/ai/openai-will-release-a-media-manager-tool-in-2025-allowing-creators-to-block-ai-training/.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Vesala Juha, „Developing Artificial Intelligence-Based Content Creation: Are EU Copyright and Antitrust Law Fit for Purpose?” IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, nr 3 (2023): 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01301-2.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Whitepress, Robots.txt – do czego służy i jakich błędów unikać przy jego tworzeniu?. https://www.whitepress.com/pl/baza-wiedzy/642/robots-txt-do-czego-sluzy-i-jakich-bledow-unikac-przy-jego-tworzeniu.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Ziaja Gina Maria, „The Text and Data Mining Opt-Out in Article 4(3) CDSMD: Adequate Veto Ziaja Gina Maria, „The Text and Data Mining Opt-Out in Article 4(3) CDSMD: Adequate Veto Right for Rightholders or a Suffocating Blanket for European Artificial Intelligence Innovations?” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, nr 5 (2024): 453-459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpae025.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.