Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

online-first

Vulnerability and the Social Dimension of the Rights Guaranteed by the Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/479zv240
Submitted
7 April 2025
Published
19-12-2025

Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights primarily protects civil and political rights; however, according to the European Court of Human Rights, its interpretation “may extend into the sphere of social and economic rights.” This paper aims to analyse the relationship between the applicant’s status as vulnerable or as belonging to a vulnerable group, and the extension of the Convention’s protection into the domain of social rights. The research focuses on judgments and decisions of the ECtHR concerning the social dimension of rights enshrined in Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Convention, in which the concept of vulnerability is invoked. The paper examines how the Court applies the concept of vulnerability and assesses its impact on the outcome of the case.

References

  1. Boutier Indira, „Understanding Vulnerability through the Eyes of the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence: Challenges and Responses” Peace Human Rights Governance, nr 1 (2024): 27-52. https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-PHRG-2024-aof-6.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Catanzariti Mariavittoria, „The Juridification of Vulnerability in the European Legal Culture” Oñati Socio-legal Series, nr 6 (2022): 1391-1416. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1314.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Domańska Monika, „Grupa jednostek jako podmiot poszukujący ochrony w postępowaniu przed ETPC. Koncepcja ochrony praw grup wrażliwych” Studia Prawnicze, nr 1 (2019): 27-47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3246689.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Engström Viljam, Mikaela Heikkilä, Maija Mustaniemi-Laakso, „Vulnerabilisation: Between Mainstreaming and Human Rights Overreach” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, nr 2 (2022): 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519221092599.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Heri Corina, Responsive Human Rights. Vulnerability, Ill-treatment and the ECtHR. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509941261
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Karska Elżbieta, Elżbieta Morawska, Jakub Czepek, Łukasz Dąbrowski, Bartłomiej Oręziak, Katarzyna Gałka, Human Rights in the European Paradigm of the Protection of Aliens. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, 2023. https://doi.org/10.13166/hr/qhlc7301.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Łasak Katarzyna, Prawa społeczne w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy EuroPrawo, 2013.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Leijten Ingrid, Core Socio-Economis Rights and the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182539.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Mayrhofer Monika, „The Concept of Vulnerability and its Relation to the Concepts of Inequality and Discrimination – a Review Article” The International Journal of Human Rights (2025): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2025.2488938.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Mikołajczyk Barbara, „Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka a «system dubliński»: uwagi w związku z wyrokiem M.S.S. przeciwko Belgii i Grecji”, [w:] Unia Europejska a prawo międzynarodowe. Księga Jubileuszowa dedykowana Prof. Elżbiecie Dyni, red. Lidia Brodowski, Dagmara Kuźniar-Kwiatek. 267-276. Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Zimowit, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Młynarska-Sobaczewska Anna, „Obowiązki państwa wynikające z praw mieszkaniowych w świetle orzecznictwa ETPC” Prawo i Więź, nr 5 (2024): 415- 436. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI52.1029.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Morawska Elżbieta, „The European Court of Human Rights Towards Group Vulnerability: An Open-Ended Approach”, [w:] Women, Children and (other) Vulnerable Groups: Standards of Protection and Challenges for International Law, red. Magdalena Półtorak, Ilona Topa. 41-76. Berlin-Bern-Bruxelles-New York-Oxford-Warszawa-Wien: Peter Lang Publishing Group, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3726/b18230.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Morris Katie, „Vulnerability, Care Ethics and the Protection of Socioeconomic Rights via Article 3 ECHR” Human Rights Law Review, nr 4 (2023): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad028.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. O’Boyle Michael, The Notion of „Vulnerable Groups” in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights, Venice Commission, Doc CDL-LA(2016)003, 12.02.2016. https://www.coe.int/en/web/venice-commission/-/CDL-LA(2016)003-e.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Pariotti Elena, „Vulnerability and Human Rights: Which Compatibility?” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36 (2023): 1401-1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09977-y.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Peroni Lourdes, Alexandra Timmer, „Vulnerable Groups. The Promise of an Emerging Concept in European Human Rights Convention Law” International Journal of Constitutional Law, nr 4 (2013): 1056-1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot042.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Timmer Alexandra, Moritz Baumgärtel, Louis Kotzé, Lieneke Slingenberg, „The Potential and Pitfalls of the Vulnerability Concept for Human Rights” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, nr 3 (2021): 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051921104800.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Wiśniewski Adam, „Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka trybunałem konstytucyjnym Europy?” Prawo i Więź, nr 5 (2021): 320-47. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi34.207.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.