logo czasopisma

Articles

No. 1 (48) (2024)

Paths of Development of Warranty Regime for Animal Defects: Analysis of Selected Examples of Mixed Jurisdictions

Submitted
21 December 2022
Published
25-03-2024

Abstract

The study concerns the analysis and juridical interpretation of the historically shaped normative solutions of the warranty for latent physical defects of animals. Analysis was conducted in selected mixed legal systems of Scots law and legal systems of Louisiana, Quebec, and South Africa. In historical and comparative terms, accurate and unfavorable attempts at legal response to the problem of diseases in live animals have been demonstrated. Hybridization schemes of civil law, which may be adopted in the future, were indicated.

References

  1. Aquilina Kevin, „Rethinking Maltese Hybridity: A Chimeric Illusion or a Healthy Grafted European Law Mixture?” Journal of Civil Law Studies, nr 2 (2011): 261-283.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Aquilina Kevin, „The Nature and Sources of the Maltese Mixed Legal System: A Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde?” Comparative Law Review, nr 1 (2013): 1-38.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Attwooll Elspeth, The Tapestry of the Law: Scotland, Legal Culture and Legal Theory. Dordrecht: Springer, 1997.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. lord Bankton Andrew McDouall, An Institute of the Laws of Scotland in Civil Rights: with Observations upon the Agreement or Diversity Between them and the Laws of England. Edinburgh: Fleming, Kincaid & Donaldson, 1751-1753.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bell George J., Commentaries on the Law of Scotland and on the Principles
    View in Google Scholar
  6. of Mercantile Jurisprudence, t. I-II. Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1990.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Bussani Mauro, Vernon V. Palmer, „The Liability Regimes of Europe – Their Façades and Interiors”, [w:] Pure Economic Loss in Europe. The Common Core of European Private Law, red. Mauro Bussani, Vernon V. Palmer. 120-162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Cycero Marek Tulliusz, „De oratore”, [w:] M. Tulli Ciceronis De Oratore Libri Tres, with Introduction and Notes, red. Augustus S. Wilkins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1902-1961.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson John A., „New France: Law, Courts, and the Coutume De Paris, 1608-1760” Manitoba Law Journal, nr 23 (1995): 32-54.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Dzikowski Andrzej, „Morbus est… Roman Views on Health of Animals as a Basis for the Present-Day Warranty Legislation” Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, nr 4 (2020): 429-442.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Erskine of Carnock, John. An Institute of the Law of Scotland. Edinburgh: Legal Education Trust, 2014.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Evans-Jones Robin, „Receptions of Law, Mixed Legal Systems and the Myth of the Genius of Scots Private Law” Law Quarterly Review, nr 114 (1998): 228-249.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Evans-Jones Robin, „The Actio Quanti Minoris in Mixed Legal Systems”, [w:] Roman Law as Formative of Modern Legal Systems, t. I, red. Janusz Sondel, Jarosław Reszczyński i Piotr Ściślicki. 79-92. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2003.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez Mark F., From Chaos to Continuity: the Evolution of Louisiana’s Judicial System, 1712-1862. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Gordon William M., „Risk in Sale – from Roman to Scots Law”, [w:] Roman Law as Formative of Modern Legal Systems, t. I, red. Janusz Sondel, Jarosław Reszczyński, Piotr Ściślicki. 115-124. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2003.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Hatzimihail Nikitas E., „Cyprus as a Mixed Legal System” Journal of Civil Law Studies, nr 1 (2013): 37-96.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Anthony M. Honoré, „The History of the Aedilitian Actions from Roman to Roman-Dutch Law”, [w:] Studies in the Roman Law of Sale Dedicated to the Memory of Francis de Zulueta, red. David Daube. 136-158. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Hood John T., „The History and Development of the Louisiana Civil Code” Louisiana Law Review, nr 1 (1958): 18-33.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Johnston David, „Sale and Transfer of Title in Roman and Scots Law”, [w:] The Roman Law Tradition, red. Andrew D. E. Lewis, David J. Ibbetson. 182-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Kaser Max, „Das römische Recht in Südafrika” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, nr 81 (1964): 1-30.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Lévy-Ullmann Henri, „The Law of Scotland” Juridical Review, nr 37 (1925): 370-390.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. MacQueen Hector L., „Mixed Jurisdictions and Convergence: Scotland” International Journal of Legal Information, nr 29 (2001): 309-322.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. McClelland Paul, The Seller’s Liability for Sale of Faulty Goods in Scots Law. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Örücü Esin, „What is a Mixed Legal System: Exclusion or Expansion?” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, nr 1 (2008): 1-18.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Örücü Esin, Elspeth Attwooll, Sean Coyle, Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing. The Hague-London-Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Palmer Vernon V., Louisiana: Microcosm of a Mixed Jurisdiction. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1999.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Palmer Vernon V., Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family. Cambridge: University Press, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Palmer Vernon V., Elspeth Ch. Reid, Mixed Jurisdictions Compared: Private Law in Louisiana and Scotland. Edinburgh: University Press, 2009.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Parise Agustin, „A Constant Give and Take: Tracing Legal Borrowings in the Louisiana Civil Law Experience” Seton Hall Legislative Journal, nr 1 (2010): 1-35.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. du Plessis Jacques, „The Promises and Pitfalls of Mixed Legal Systems: the South African and Scottish experiences” Stellenbosch Law Review, nr 3 (1998): 338-343.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Reid Kenneth, „The »Actio Quanti Minoris« and Conveyancing Practice” Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, nr 33 (1988): 285-287.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Reid Kenneth, „The Idea of Mixed Legal Systems” Tulane Law Review, nr 78 (2003): 5-40.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Reid Kenneth, Reinhard Zimmermann, A History of Private Law in Scotland, t. I-II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Rousseau-Houle Thérèse, Précis du droit de la vente et du louage. Québec: Presses Université Laval, 1986.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Sellar William D.H., „Scots Law: Mixed from the Very Beginning? A Tale of Two Receptions” Edinburgh Law Review, nr 1 (2000): 3-18.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Smith Thomas B., Studies Critical and Comparative. Edinburgh: Green & Son, 1962.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Smits Jan M., „European Private Law as a Mixed Legal System” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, nr 5 (1998): 328-340.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Smits Jan M., „The Harmonisation of Private Law in Europe: Some Insights from Evolutionary Theory” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, nr 31 (2002): 79-99.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Smits Jan M., The Making of European Private Law: Toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a Mixed Legal System. Antwerpen-Oxford-New York: Intersentia, 2002.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. viscount Stair Dalrymple James, The Institutions of the Law of Scotland. Edinburgh-Glasgow: The University Presses, 1981.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Stein Peter, Fault in the Formation of Contract in Roman Law and Scots Law. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1958.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Symeonides Symeon, „The Mixed Legal System of the Republic of Cyprus” Tulane Law Review, nr 78 (2003): 441-442.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Tetley William, „Mixed Jurisdictions: Common Law vs. Civil Law (Codified and Uncodified)” Uniform Law Review, nr 4 (1999): 677-738.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Thomson Joe M., „Legal Change and Scots Private Law”, [w:] Critical Studies in Ancient Law. Comparative Law and Legal History: Essays in Honour of Alan Watson, red. John Cairns, Olivia Robinson. 379-391. Oxford: Hart, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Thomson Stephen, „Mixed Jurisdiction and the Scottish Legal Tradition: Reconsidering the Concept of Mixture” Journal of Civil Law Studies, nr 1 (2014): 51-91.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. de Wet Johannes Ch., Andreas H. van Wyk, Die Suid-Afrikaanse Kontraktereg en Handelsreg, t. I, Durban: Butterworths, 1992.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Zimmermann Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Zimmermann Reinhard, „Common law und ius commune. Unkodifizierte Mischrechtsordnungen im Vergleich”, [w:] Aufbruch nach Europa. 75 Jahre Max-Planck-Institut für Privatrecht, red. Jürgen Basedow, Ulrich Drobnig, Reinhard Ellger, Klaus J. Hopt, Hein Kötz, Rainer Kulms. 852-854. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Zimmermann Reinhard, Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law. The Civilian Tradition Today. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Zimmermann Reinhard, Daniel Visser. Southern Cross. Civil Law and Common Law in South Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Zweigert Konrad, Hein Kötz. An Introduction to Comparative Law. The framework. Amsterdam-New York-Oxford: University Press, 1977.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.