
The premise of impoverishment in the overpayment of tax has been disputed in doctrine and jurisprudence for many years. The Supreme Administrative Court (resolution I GPs 1/11) took a position on the legal relevancy of the overpayment that is paradoxical, instead of trying to unify the jurisprudence on
this issue. The resolution led to even greater jurisprudential disputes. It has not been established for more than ten years whether the resolution has a binding effect on all indirect taxes or only on the excise tax on electricity. The author focuses on how the resolution binds other administrative courts and their jurisprudence.