Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

online-first

Protection of Family Members of the Deceased not Related by Blood or Mariage in the Law of European States

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/sawgsw93
Submitted
11 November 2025
Published
19-12-2025

Abstract

This study aims to demonstrate, using examples from selected European jurisdictions, the extent to which persons not related by blood or marriage to the deceased are protected in the event of their death. In other words, it considers those outside the traditionally and narrowly defined family unit. This protection can be seen at several levels: they may be granted intestate succession status, a right to a fixed portion of the estate or a forced share, certain housing rights (such as the right to use the dwelling and furnishings or succeed to a tenancy upon the tenant’s death) and maintenance-type claims. It is these various forms of protection that provide the framework for the analysis.

References

  1. Agell Anders, “Family Forms and Legal Policies. A Comparative View from a Swedish Observer,” Scandinavian Studies in Law, 38 (1999): 197-216.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Asland John, “The Legal Position of the Surviving De facto Partner,” [in:] Nordic Cohabitation Law, Goran Lind, Margareta Brattström, Ingrid Lund-Andersen, Anna Singer, John Asland, Tone Sverdrup. 161-210. Antwerp: Intersentia Ltd, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Cantalini Stefano, Sofi Ohlsson-Wijk, Gunnar Andersson, “Cohabitation and Marriage Formation in Times of Fertility Decline: The Case of Sweden in the Twenty First Century” European Journal of Population, No. 1 (2024): 15-41.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Cottier Michelle, “Ein zeitgemässes Erbrecht für die Schweiz. Bericht zur Motion 10.3524 Gutzwiller «Für ein zeitgemässes Erbrecht» zuhanden des Bundesamts für Justiz“ not@lex /succession, (2014): 29- 55.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Doignon Yoann, Thierry Eggerickx, Ester Rizzi, “The spatial diffusion of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium over 25 years: Geographic proximity and urban hierarchy” Demographic Research, 43 (2020): 1413-1428
    View in Google Scholar
  6. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/pensjon-trygd-og-sosiale-tjenester/innsikt/trygdesystemet/regulering-av-folketrygdens-grunnbelop-og-pensjoner/id2008616/.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/priser-och-ekonomiska-tendenser/priser/konsumentprisindex-kpi/pong/statistiknyhet/prisbasbeloppet-for-ar-2025/.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Nazar Mirosław, “Cywilnoprawne zagadnienia konkubinatu de lege ferenda” Państwo i Prawo, No. 12 (1989): 103-113.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Schmidt Jan Peter, “Intestate Succession in Latin America,” [in:] Intestate Succession, ed. Kenneth G. C. Reid, Marius J. de Waal, Reinhard Zimmermann. 118-158. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Sobański Piotr, “«Pflegevermächtnis» – austriacki sposób na wynagrodzenie za opiekę nad zmarłym” Rejent, No. 2 (2022): 47-67.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Vines Prue E., Nicola Peart, “Intestate Succession in Australia and New Zealand,” [in:] Intestate Succession, ed. Kenneth G. C. Reid, Marius J. de Waal, Reinhard Zimmermann. 349-369. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Zahl-Olsen Rune, Frode Thuen, Tonje Holte Stea, “Cohabitation, Marriage, and Union Dissolution in Norway: A Comparative Prospective Study” Journal of Divorce & Remarriages, No. 5-6 (2023): 199-216.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Załucki Mariusz, “Inheritance Law in the Republic of Poland and Other Former Eastern Bloc Countries: Recodification of the Circle of Statutory Heirs” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, No. 2 (2010): 1-8.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Załucki Mariusz, “Krąg spadkobierców ustawowych de lege lata i de lege ferenda” Przegląd Sądowy, No. 1 (2008): 94-105.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.