Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Artykuły

online-first

Protection of Family Members of the Deceased not Related by Blood or Mariage in the Law of European States

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/sawgsw93
Przesłane
11 listopada 2025
Opublikowane
19-12-2025

Abstrakt

This study aims to demonstrate, using examples from selected European jurisdictions, the extent to which persons not related by blood or marriage to the deceased are protected in the event of their death. In other words, it considers those outside the traditionally and narrowly defined family unit. This protection can be seen at several levels: they may be granted intestate succession status, a right to a fixed portion of the estate or a forced share, certain housing rights (such as the right to use the dwelling and furnishings or succeed to a tenancy upon the tenant’s death) and maintenance-type claims. It is these various forms of protection that provide the framework for the analysis.

Bibliografia

  1. Agell Anders, “Family Forms and Legal Policies. A Comparative View from a Swedish Observer,” Scandinavian Studies in Law, 38 (1999): 197-216.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  2. Asland John, “The Legal Position of the Surviving De facto Partner,” [in:] Nordic Cohabitation Law, Goran Lind, Margareta Brattström, Ingrid Lund-Andersen, Anna Singer, John Asland, Tone Sverdrup. 161-210. Antwerp: Intersentia Ltd, 2015.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  3. Cantalini Stefano, Sofi Ohlsson-Wijk, Gunnar Andersson, “Cohabitation and Marriage Formation in Times of Fertility Decline: The Case of Sweden in the Twenty First Century” European Journal of Population, No. 1 (2024): 15-41.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  4. Cottier Michelle, “Ein zeitgemässes Erbrecht für die Schweiz. Bericht zur Motion 10.3524 Gutzwiller «Für ein zeitgemässes Erbrecht» zuhanden des Bundesamts für Justiz“ not@lex /succession, (2014): 29- 55.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  5. Doignon Yoann, Thierry Eggerickx, Ester Rizzi, “The spatial diffusion of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium over 25 years: Geographic proximity and urban hierarchy” Demographic Research, 43 (2020): 1413-1428
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  6. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/pensjon-trygd-og-sosiale-tjenester/innsikt/trygdesystemet/regulering-av-folketrygdens-grunnbelop-og-pensjoner/id2008616/.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  7. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/priser-och-ekonomiska-tendenser/priser/konsumentprisindex-kpi/pong/statistiknyhet/prisbasbeloppet-for-ar-2025/.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  8. Nazar Mirosław, “Cywilnoprawne zagadnienia konkubinatu de lege ferenda” Państwo i Prawo, No. 12 (1989): 103-113.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  9. Schmidt Jan Peter, “Intestate Succession in Latin America,” [in:] Intestate Succession, ed. Kenneth G. C. Reid, Marius J. de Waal, Reinhard Zimmermann. 118-158. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  10. Sobański Piotr, “«Pflegevermächtnis» – austriacki sposób na wynagrodzenie za opiekę nad zmarłym” Rejent, No. 2 (2022): 47-67.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  11. Vines Prue E., Nicola Peart, “Intestate Succession in Australia and New Zealand,” [in:] Intestate Succession, ed. Kenneth G. C. Reid, Marius J. de Waal, Reinhard Zimmermann. 349-369. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  12. Zahl-Olsen Rune, Frode Thuen, Tonje Holte Stea, “Cohabitation, Marriage, and Union Dissolution in Norway: A Comparative Prospective Study” Journal of Divorce & Remarriages, No. 5-6 (2023): 199-216.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  13. Załucki Mariusz, “Inheritance Law in the Republic of Poland and Other Former Eastern Bloc Countries: Recodification of the Circle of Statutory Heirs” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, No. 2 (2010): 1-8.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  14. Załucki Mariusz, “Krąg spadkobierców ustawowych de lege lata i de lege ferenda” Przegląd Sądowy, No. 1 (2008): 94-105.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.