Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 60 No. 1 (2026): Prawo i Więź

International Experiences in Applying Artificial Intelligence to Prevent Intellectual Property Infringement, and Implications for Vietnam

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/kz678f68
Submitted
16 December 2025
Published
19-02-2026

Abstract

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights worldwide. This paper examines how AI technologies are being applied internationally to detect, prevent, and manage copyright and patent infringement, and extrapolates key implications for Vietnam. However, advances of AI also raise complex legal, ethical, and policy questions. The study proposes a conceptual model integrating AI tools with human oversight to strengthen IP protection, and suggests that Vietnam adapt its legal framework and enforcement strategies in line with international best practices. In conclusion, Vietnam can leverage international experiences to craft forward-looking policies that harness AI in IP enforcement, bolstering its capacity to combat infringement in the digital era, while upholding legal and ethical standards.

References

  1. Agency for Cultural Affairs, Government of Japan, Amendments to the Copyright Act. 2020. https://www.bunka.go.jp/english/.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Awad Tarek, “Universalizing Copyright Fair Use: To Copy, or not to Copy?” Journal of Intellectual Property Law, No. 1 (2022): 1-6.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Collopy Andrew, “AI and the future of patent enforcement” WIPO Magazine, 2024. https://www.wipo.int.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Communia Association. Article 17 Implementation Analysis. 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Digital Defynd, How Alibaba fights counterfeiting with AI. n.d. https://digitaldefynd.com.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Digital Defynd, How Alibaba Uses AI to Remove Counterfeit Listings. 2023. https://digitaldefynd.com.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Hacohen Uri, Adi Haviv, Shahar Sarfaty, Bruria Friedman, Niva Elkin-Koren, Roi Livni, Amit H Bermano, “Not All Similarities are Created Equal: Leveraging Data-Driven Biases to Inform GenAI Copyright Disputes” arXiv, (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17691.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Lou Chao, “Develop-Fair Use for Artificial Intelligence: A Sino-U.S. Copyright Law Comparison Based on the Ultraman, Bartz v. Anthropic, and Kadrey v. Meta Cases” arXiv, (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07365.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. McCutcheon Megan, Jorge Marquez, “AI-Assisted Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: Opportunities and Risks” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, No. 9 (2022): 753-764. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac048.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Musically, How Content ID works. n.d. https://musically.com.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Ray Anirudh, “AI in IPR: Leveraging Technology for Efficiency and Addressing Concerns” Ile Lex Speculum, No. 1 (2023): 333-341.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Ray Anirudh, “Semantic Search and AI in Patent Analytics.” Journal of Intellectual Property Technology, No. 4 (2023): 221-239.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Snapdragon IP, “AI in Patent Enforcement.” n.d. https://snapdragon-ip.com.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Subhadharshini M., “Artificial Intelligence Applications in Copyright Enforcement” International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management, No. 1 (2024): 45-57.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Subhadharshini R., “Deep Learning Applications in Copyright Infringement Detection” International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management, 9 (2024): 112-128.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Subhadharshini S., “A Critical Analysis of AI Infringement Detection from Legal Perspective with Special References to Chennai” International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, No. 7 (2024): 813-831.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Świerczyński, Marek. Zbigniew Więckowski, “Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence – Selected Issues” Prawo i Więź, No. 3 (2022): 179-202. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi41.469.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Tran Pham T., “Legal Provisions and Practical Aspects of Evidence Collection in High-Tech Crimes,” [in:] Proceedings of the Conference Cybercrime from Criminal Law Perspective. 352-353. Ho Chi Minh City: Ton Duc Thang University & People’s Police University, People’s Public Security Publishing House, n.d.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. TT Consultants, AI in Patent Analytics. 2023.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), WIPO Technology Trends: Artificial Intelligence. 2023. https://www.wipo.int.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. World Intellectual Property Organization, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: A WIPO Overview. Geneva: WIPO, 2023. https://www.wipo.int.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. World Intellectual Property Organization, Generative AI: Navigating Intellectual Property Challenges. 2023. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4644.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO Technology Trends 2019: Artificial Intelligence. Geneva: WIPO, 2020. https://www.wipo.int/tech_trends/en/artificial_intelligence.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO Technology Trends 2023: Artificial Intelligence. Geneva: WIPO, 2023. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4690.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. YouTube, Content ID Annual Report. 2022. https://support.google.com/youtube.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. YouTube, Content ID. 2024. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797370.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.