logo czasopisma

Articles

No. 4 (47) (2023)

Artificial Intelligence Training and Copyright Infringement: Evidentiary Aspects

Submitted
16 November 2023
Published
14-02-2024

Abstract

The inspiration for this paper was a lawsuit against OpenAI and related companies filed in 2023 in the United States District Court of the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. The plaintiffs (authors) alleged, among other things, copyright infringement by using their novels to train AI without their consent. The purpose of this article is to assess, through the prism of Polish law, the plaintiffs' chances of success in a similar dispute hypothetically taking place in Poland. However, due to the limited scope of this paper, its scope was limited to evidentiary issues. This is an interesting aspect, which has been neglected in the doctrine so far, and at the same time it is undoubtedly crucial from a practical point of view. The conclusions of the considerations made will be related to the postulates presented regarding the solution at the legal level of some copyright problems related to the training of AI.

References

  1. Abhijit Ghosh, „Artificial Intelligence as an Innovation in the Film Industry” Research Inspiration, nr 3 (2023): 12-16.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Aboze Brian John, GPT-3.5 vs. GPT-4: Unveiling the Power of the Next-Generation Language Models. https://deepchecks.com/gpt-3-5-vs-gpt-4-unveiling-the-power-of-the-next-generation-language-models/.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Postępowania odrębne. System Postępowania Cywilnego, t. VI, red. Anna Machnikowska. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Bellaiche Lucas, Rohin Shahi, Martin Harry Turpin, Anya Ragnhildstveit, Shawn Sprockett, Nathaniel Barr, Alexander Christensen, Paul Seli, „Humans versus AI: Whether and Why we Prefer Human‑Created Compared to AI‑Created Artwork” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8 (2023): 1-22.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bier Henriette, „Implications of Robotics and AI in Architecture”, [w:] Disruptive Technologies: The Convergence of New Paradigms in Architecture, red. Morel Philippe, Bier, Henriette. 3-5, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Brittain Blake, „Lawsuits Accuse AI Content Creators of Misusing Copyrighted Work” REUTERS.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Butz Martin V., „Towards Strong AI” KI – Künst Intelligenz, (2021): 91-101.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. AI in Clinical Medicin. A Practical Guide for Healthcare Professionals, red. Michael F. Byrne. Hobocken: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2023.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Chaka Chaka, „Detecting AI Content in Responses Generated by ChatGPT, YouChat, and Chatsonic: The Case of Five AI Content Detection Tools” Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, nr 2 (2023): 1-11.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, Andzrzej Zieliński, Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2022, Legalis.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Gołaszewska Agnieszka, „Komentarz do artykułu 479106”, [w:] Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Art. 506–1217, t. II, red. Agnieszka Gołaszewska, Tomasz Szanciło. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2023, Legalis.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Graßl Michael, Jonas Schützeneder, Klaus Meier, „Artificial Intelligence as a Tool of Assistance A Acientific and Practical Perspective on AI in Journalism” Journalism Research, nr 1 (2022): 3-24.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Härkönen Heidi, „Fashion Piracy and Artificial Intelligence—does the New Creative Environment Come with New Copyright Issues?” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, nr 3 (2020): 163-172. https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/lawsuits-accuse-ai-content-creators-misusing-copyrighted-work-2023-01-17/.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Hutson James, „Content Creation or Interpolation: AI Generative Digital Art in the Classroom” Metaverse, nr 1 (2023): 1-13.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Samborski Jacek, AI w produkcji filmowej. https://filmpro.com.pl/ai-w-produkcji-filmowej/.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Jasińska Katarzyna, „Judge’s e-assistant in Common Courts”, [w:] Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, red. Martin, Laura Miraut, Załucki, Mariusz. 77-90. Madryt Dykinson Editorial, 2021. https://www.dykinson.com/libros/artificial-intelligence-and-human-rights/9788413778174/.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Jasińska Katarzyna, „Czy »referendarza z Lublina« może zastąpić »sędzia robot«?” Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i materiały, nr 1 (2020): 89-101.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Jasińska Katarzyna, Zbigniew Pinkalski, Justyna Rasiewicz, Anna Sokołowska-Ławniczak, Metodyka pracy pełnomocnika w sprawach cywilnych z zakresu prawa własności intelektualnej. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Kaplan Andreas¸ Michael Haenlein, „Siri, Siri in my Hand, who’s the Fairest in the Land? On the Interpretations, Illustrations and Implications of Artificial Intelligence” Business Horizons, 1 (2019): 15-25.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Kavitha L „Copyright Challenges in the Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Transforming the Film Industry from Script to Screen” Trinity Law Review, nr 1 (2024): 2-8.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Kubera Grzegorz, „Ludzie nie czytają książek, za to piszą ich bardzo dużo. »Zalewają nas powieści generowane przez AI«” Bussiness Insider, 1 października 2023.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Kunc-Urbańczyk, Karina, „Uczenie maszynowe jako pole eksploatacji utworów”, [w:] Prawo sztucznej inteligencji i nowych technologii, red. Bogdan Fischer, Adam Pązik, Marek Świerczyński. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2021, Lex.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Lee Angie, What Are Large Language Models Used For?. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2023/01/26/what-are-large-language-models-used-for/.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Lee Yu-Hsu, Chun-Yao Chiu, „The Impact of AI Text-to-Image Generator on Product Styling Design”, [w:] Human Interface and Management of Information, red. Yumi Ashaki, Mori Hirohiko. 502-515. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Lo Danica, What is Generative AI? Here’s how ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence will Change Business, Fast Company, 18 grudnia 2022. https://www.fastcompany.com/90826178/generative-ai.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Postępowania odrębne. System Postępowania Cywilnego, t. VI, red. Anna Machnikowska. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Major, Małgorzata, Koniec strajku amerykańskich scenarzystów. Kto wygrał, a kto przegrał?. https://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/koniec-strajk-scenarzysta-seriale-film-zarobki.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Markiewicz Ryszard, „ChatGPT i prawo autorskie Unii Europejskiej” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego PPWI, nr 2 (2023): LEX/el.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Md Monirul Islam, „Artificial Intelligence in Indian Films: Anukul and AI Ethics” Short Film Studies, nr 2 (2022): 183-192.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Morawski Lech, Domniemania a dowody prawnicze. Toruń: Wydawnictwo UMK, 1981.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. OpenAI (2023), GPT-4 Technical Report. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Radford Alec, KarthikNarasimhan, TimSalimans, Ilya Sutskever, Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training, 2018. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/openai-assets/research-covers/language unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Sieńsko Małgorzata, „Komentarz do artykułu 231”, [w:] Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz aktualizowany, t. I, Art. 1-477(16), red. Małgorzata Manowska. Lex/el. 2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Szczudlik Katarzyna, Rozwiązywanie sporów (arbitraż) a Sztuczna Inteligencja, Założenia do strategii AI w Polsce. Plan działań Ministerstwa Cyfryzacji. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Cyfryzacji, 2018, http://cli.re/LNXz9N.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Więzowska-Czepiel Beata, „Sztuczna inteligencja w arbitrażu – wsparcie dla arbitrów w procesie podejmowania decyzji” Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały, nr 2 (2019): 57-65.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.