Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 2 (2024): Prawo i Więź Nr 2 (49) 2024

The Rise and Popularity of Arbitration in the Banking Sector in EU

Submitted
13 February 2024
Published
24-05-2024

Abstract

Aim of this paper is to explain relationship between court and the tribunal of arbitration. Resolution of disputes in banking sector has always received the attention of not only the parties involved in the process, but also paid special attention to the general opinion. The alternative resolution of banking disputes through arbitration should be considered as an efficient and quick way of resolving disputes. This paper examines the importance of resolving disputes in banking sector through arbitration versus regular courts, advantages and disadvantages, especially in banking sector of Kosovo.

Using Kosovo as a case study, and some cases at the CJEU the article focuses on how the arbitration of cases in the banking sector has impacts the issue of disputes has existed for a long time, a significant number of unresolved cases in the banking sector, in large monetary values ​​are blocked in the judicial system. With the alternative resolution, those tools would be placed in the function of the country's economy, and yet so far this process has not been used as much as it should be in Kosovo. The research uses qualitative methods and focuses on patterns in existing documents and empirical case studies, and also the resarch uses comparative method involving European Union (EU) states.

The article examines the impact of arbitration as a quick and efficient resolution to disputes in banking sector. The rules provide a well-structured procedure and institutional framework to ensure that arbitrations are conducted with integrity, efficiency, and fairness. also the sustainable economicdevelopment of country.

Article focuses particularly on the growing popularity of arbitration in the banking sector in Kosovo, ultimately, arbitration as a dispute resolution procedure, especially disputes that are related to the obligation of a policy, extent of a loss or damage and other related issues with the terms of the insurance contract (policy).

So, the actors of the banking sector in the EU and especially in Kosovo, including licensed insurance companies or insurance brokers, cannot deny the arbitration of a dispute. It concludes that the quick and effective resolution of disputes that come from the banking sector should see arbitration as the most efficient alternative for resolving disputes with greater professionalism and safety.

References

  1. Board of the Central Bank of the Republic of Kosovo, Regulation on Arbitration Tribunal Procedures, 30 March 2017. https://bqk-kos.org/repository/docs/korniza_ligjore/english/Rregullore%20per%20Procedurat%20e%20Tribunalit%20te%20Arbitrazhit-Eng.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Budnitz Mark E., „Arbitration of Disputes Between Consumers and Financial Institutions: a Serious Threat to Consumer Protection” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, No. 2 (1994): 267. https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1187&context=faculty_pub.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Central Bank of Kosovo, Annual Report 2022, 2022. https://bqk-kos.org/publications/cbk-annual-report/?lang=en.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Central Bank of Kosovo, Functions and Responsibilities, 2024. https://bqk-kos.org/?lang=en.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Dafe Florence, Zoe Williams, „Banking on Courts: Financialization and the Rise of Third-Party Funding in Investment Arbitration” Review of International Political Economy, No. 5 (2021): 1362-1384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1764378.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Daly Joseph L., „Arbitration: The Basics” Journal of American Arbitration, 5 (2006): 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1947042.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. del Rio A. Oscar Ruiz, „Arbitration Clauses in International Loans” Journal of International Arbitration, 4 (1987): 45. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.kluwer/jia0004&div=37&id=&page=.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Fons Manuel Penades, „The Effectiveness of EU Law and Private Arbitration” Common Market Law Review, Bo. 4 (2020): 1069-1106. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2020716.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Freeman James, „The Use of Arbitration in the Financial Services Industry” Business Law International, 16 (2015): 77.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Han Irene, „Rethinking the Use of Arbitration Clauses by Financial Institutions” Journal of International Arbitration, No. 2 (2017): 207-237. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2017012.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Hatami Alamdari Bahar, „The Emerging Popularity of International Arbitration in Banking and Financial Sector–Is this a Fashionable Trend or a Viable Replacement?. Doctoral thesis, University of London, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Hodges Paula, Hannah Ambrose, Use of Arbitration in the Banking and Finance Sector (Part 1): Lcia Statistics Show Growth. Herbert Smith Freehills, 2022. https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2022/05/19/use-of-arbitration-in-the-banking-and-finance-sector-part-1-lcia-statistics-show-growth/.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Horn Norbert, „The Development of Arbitration in International Financial Transactions” Arbitration International, No. 3 (2014): 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008947319883.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Kagan Robert A., „Should Europe Worry About Adversarial Legalism?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, No. 2 (1997): 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/17.2.165.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Meijer Gerard J., Richard H. Hansen, „Arbitration and Financial Services”, [in:] Controlling Capital. Public and Private Regulation of Financial Markets, ed. Nicholas Dorn. 193-209. London: Routledge, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Odermatt Jed, „The Court of Justice of the European Union and International Dispute Settlement: Conflict, Cooperation and Coexistence” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 24 (2022): 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2022.9.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Ollivier Nicolas, Caroline dos Santos, „Banking and Finance Disputes: to Arbitrate or not to Arbitrate, that is the Question” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Finanzmarktrecht/SZW, 4 (2020): 449-459. https://www.lalive.law/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/06_SZW_2020_04_Ollivier_DosSantos_SZW-Link-1.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Park William W., „Arbitration in banking and finance” Arbitration in Banking and Finance, 17 (1998): 213. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/annrbfl17&div=6&id=&page=.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. „Potential of banking sector in Kosovo: Challenges and Opportunities” The Kosovo Banker, No. 16 (2019): 1-52. https://www.bankassoc-kos.com/uploads/files/2019/December/11/20_-_The_Kosovo_Banker_Nr._16_-_ENG_-_02_-_WEB1576077890.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Rosas Allan, „The EU and international dispute settlement” Europe and the World: A law review, No. 1 (2017): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2017.03.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Stipanowich Thomas J., Amy J. Schmitz, Arbitration. Boston: Aspen Publishing, 2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Tasnim Ahmed, „The CJEU and the Introduction of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms within the EU: Is Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU in safe hands?” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 22 (2022): 491. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1507&context=drlj.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.