The author aims to respond to the position of the Supreme Court expressed in the judgment of 24 April 2018, V CNP 22/17, and thus to answer the question of whether “in
a situation where the flat area of the person entitled to maintenance exceeds what is necessary to satisfy the justified housing needs of one person, the expectation of its sale does not violate the rule that the entitled person cannot be required to dispose of the house or apartment which serves to meet his justified housing needs”? The analysis of the voted judgment leads to a positive answer to this question, and thus to the approval of the opinion of
the Supreme Court. The author presents arguments in favor of the accuracy of the thesis formulated by the Supreme Court.