Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Nr 1 (39) (2022)

The American Security Model and Its Influence over European Social and Juridic Values

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi39.340
Przesłane
12 grudnia 2021
Opublikowane
01.04.2022

Abstrakt

The author describes the evolution from the USA individual-centric state towards the administrative and regulatory one. The author examines the very different models of security for the USA and Europe and its influence over European social and juridic values.

Bibliografia

  1. Andreas Peter, Ethan Nadelmann, Policing the globe. Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  2. Baker Bonnie, Jennifer Elsea, Charles Doyle, The Posse Comitatus Act and Related Matters. New York: Novinka, 2004.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  3. Ballbé Manuel, „La competencia como principio vertebrador del sistema pluralista”, [in:] Anuario de la competencia de 1998. 109-123. Barcelona: Fundación ICO-Marcial Pons, 1998.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  4. Ballbé Manuel, Roser Martínez, Soberanía Dual y Constitución Integradora. La reciente doctrina federal de la Corte Suprema norteamericana. Barcelona: Ariel, 2003.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  5. Ballbé Manuel, Carlos Padrós, Estado competitivo y armonización europea. Barcelona: Ariel, 1997.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  6. Derthick Martha, National Guard in Politics. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1965.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  7. Djelic Marie-Laure, „Does Europe Mean Americanization? The Case of Competition” Competition and Change, Vol. 6 (2002): 233-250.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  8. Djelic Marie-Laure, Exporting the American Model. The Postwar Transformation of European Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  9. Dorman Michael, The secret service story. New York: Delacorte, 1967.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  10. Elias Norbert, El proceso de la civilización. Madrid: FCE, 1987.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  11. Epp Charles, The Rights Revolution. Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  12. Font i Rius Josep Maria, Estudios sobre los derechos e instituciones locales en la Cataluña medieval. Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universidad de Barcelona, 1985.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  13. Geradin Damien, Rodolphe Muñoz, Nicolas Petit, Regulation Through Agencies in the EU. A New Paradigm of European Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  14. Gilligan James, Preventing Violence. London: Thames and Hudson, 2001.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  15. Horan James, The Pinkertons: The Detective Dynasty that Made History. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 1967.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  16. Jeffreys-Jones Rhodri, Cloak and Dollar. New Heaven: Yale University Press, 2002.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  17. Karch, et al., „Surveillance for Violent Deaths – National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 States, 2006”, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – Morbidity and mortality weekly report (MMWR) Surveillance Summaries, December, 4 (2020) (8): 1-37. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/ss/ss6908a1.htm?s_cid=ss6908a1_w.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  18. Kates Don, Gary Mauser, „Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 30 (2007): 649-694.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  19. Kingsbury Benedict, Richard Stewart, Nico Krisch, „The Emergence of Global Administrative Law” Law and Contemporary Problems (2005): 15-61.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  20. Kingsbury Benedict, „The Concept of Law in Global Administrative Law” European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009): 23-57.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  21. Kopel David, „The Natural Right of Self-Defense: Heller’s Lesson for the World” Syracuse Law Review, 59 (2008): 99-116.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  22. Kopel David, Paul Gallant, Joanne Eisen, „Human Rights and Gun Confiscation” QLR, 26 (2008).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  23. Krug Etienne, Kenneth Powell, Linda Lahlberg, „Firearm-Related Deaths in the United States and 35 Other High – and Upper-Middle – Income Countries” International Journal of Epidemiology, 27 (1998): 214-221.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  24. Leander Anna, „Globalization and the State Monopoly on the Legitimate Use of Force” Political Science Publication, 7 (2004).
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  25. https://www.sdu.dk/~/media/Files/Om_SDU/Institutter/Statskundskab/Skriftserie/04ANL7%20pdf.ashx
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  26. Lott John, More Guns, Less Crime. Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2010.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  27. Martínez Roser, Armas: Libertad americana o prevención europea? Barcelona: Ariel, 2002.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  28. Martínez Roser, Armas: ¿Libertad americana o prevención europea?: Dos modelos contrapuestos. Editorial Académica española, 2019.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  29. McCleary Rachel, Robert Barro, „Religion and Economy” Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 20 (2006): 49-72.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  30. Monnet Jean, Memorias. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 1985.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  31. Monnier François, „La naissance du contentieux administratif moderne” Revue Administrative, 286 (1995): 348-354.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  32. Nadelmann Ethan, Cops across borders. The internationalization of U.S. Criminal Law Enforcement. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  33. Parrillo Nicholas, „The De-Privatization of American Warfare: How the U.S. Government Used, Regulated, and Ultimately Abandoned Privateering in the Nineteenth Century” Yale Journal of Law and Human, Vol. 19 (2007): 1-96.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  34. Perry Ivan, „Violence: A Public Health Perspective” Global Crime, No. 4 (2009): 368-395.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  35. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17440570903248395.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  36. Rao Gautham, „The Federal Posse Comitatus Doctrine: Slavery, Compulsion, and Statecraft in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America” Law and History Review, 26 (2008): 1-56.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  37. Rosky Clifford, „Force, Inc.: the Privatization of Punishment, Policing, and Military Force in Liberal States” Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 36 (2004): 879-1032.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  38. Scahill Jeremy, Blackwater. The Rise of the World Most Powerful Mercenar Army. New York: Nation Book, 2007.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  39. Seward Desmon, The Monks of War. The Military Religious Orders. London: Penguin Books, 1995.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  40. Shain Alan, The Myth of American Individualism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  41. Singer Peter, Corporate Warriors. The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  42. Skowronek Stephen, Building a New American State. The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1977-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  43. Skowronek Stephen et al., Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  44. Steiner Heinz, „The Indispensable Metaphor of War. On Populist Politics and the Contradictions of the State’s Monopoly of Force” Theoreticical Criminology, 7 (2003): 265-291.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  45. Stewart Richard, „The Reformation of American Administrative Law” Harvard Law Review, 88 (1975):1167-1813.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  46. Stewart Richard, „U.S. Administrative Law: a Model for Global Administrative Law” Law and Contemporary Problems, 68 (2005): 63-108.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  47. Sunstein Cass, After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1990.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  48. Ullman Walter, Il papato nel Medioevo. Roma: Laterza, 1999.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  49. Ullman Walter, Law and Jurisdiction in the Middle Ages. Farnham: Ashgate, 1999.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  50. Verkuil Paul, Outsourcing Sovereignty. Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  51. Waldrep Christopher, The Many Faces of Judge Lynch. Extralegal Violence and Punishment in America. New York: Palgrave, 2002.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  52. Wessel Jared, „The Financial Action Task Force: a Study in Balancing Sovereignty with Equality in Global Administrative Law” Widener Law Review, 13 (2006): 169-198.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  53. Whitlock Craig, The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War. New York: Simon&Schuster, 2021.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  54. Wood Jennifer, Clifford Shearing, Imaging Security. Portland-Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 2007.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>
  55. Zimmerman Frederic, District of Columbia et al. v. Heller: Supreme Court Establishes an Individual Right to Bear Arms Under the Second Amendment. So much for Gun Control. Ann Arbor: Nimble Books LLC, 2008.
    Obejrzyj w Google Scholar -->>

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.