Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 4 (2024): Law & Social Bonds Nr 4 (51) 2024

Human Rights and the Geopolitical Rivalry in the Twenty-First Century

Submitted
13 September 2024
Published
27-09-2024

Abstract

Human rights are among the recognized areas of international law. However, global actors such as the United States, the European Union, China and Russia have different perceptions of their place in the international order. These differences have been exacerbated as China and Russia have increasingly challenged the dominant position of the United States since the late 20th century. Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and the practical division of the world into the West and East have been of additional importance in exacerbating the differences. The positions of these parties with regard to human rights are presented in the context of the formulation of doctrines of the international order, the attitude towards the attempt to recognize that certain human rights constitute norms juris cogentis, and the relationship between human rights and unilateral coercive measures.

References

  1. Bailes Alyson J.K., Anna Wetter, „Security Strategies”, [w:] Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, online, January 2013.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Cai Congyan, „China’s position and practice concerning unilateral sanctions”, [w:] Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, ed. Charlotte Beaucillon. 70-89. Northampton-Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Cai Congyan, The Rise of China and International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Chan Phil C. W., „China’s Approaches to International Law since the Opium War” Leiden Journal of International Law, nr 4 (2014): 859-892.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Chan Phil C., China, State Sovereignty and International Legal Order. The Hague: Brill-Nijhoff, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Chin John J., Kiron Skinner, Clay Yoo, „Understanding National Security Strategies Through Time” Texas National Security Review, No. 4 (2023): 103-124.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Dai Ruijun, „China and International Human Rights Law”, [w:] The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law, red. Ignacio de la Rasilla, Congyan Cai. 261-283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Mälksoo Lauri, „Russia and China Challenge the Western Hegemony in the Interpretation of International Law” EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, July 15, 2016. https://www.ejiltalk.org/russia-and-china-challenge-the-western-hegemony-in-the-interpretation-of-international-law/.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Roberts Anthea, Is International Law International?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. The Impact of Human Rights on General International Law, red. Menno Kamminga, Martin Scheinin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50. An Assessment of the Fundamental Principles of International Law, red. Jorge E. Viñuales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Timofieev Ivan N., „Unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions policy: the Russian dimension”, [w:] Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, red. Charlotte Beaucillon. 90-109. Northampton-Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Vanneste Frédéric, General International Law before Human Rights Courts. Assessing the Speciality Claims of International Human Rights Law. Cambridge-Antwerp: Intersentia 2010.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Visek Richard, „Statement at the 77 th session of the General Assembly Sixth Committee meeting on the Report of the ILC on its 73rd Session, October 25, 2022” Digest of United States Practice in International Law (2022), 299-301. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2022-Digest-of-United-States-Practice-in-International-Law.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Wang Chao, Xin Xiang, „The Constitution of China and International Law. From Selective Adaptation to Normative Consensus”, [w:] The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law, red. Ignacio de la Rasilla, Congyan Cai. 73-93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Wang Jiangyu, Huaer Cheng, „China’s Approach to International Law: From Traditional Westphalianism to Aggressive Instrumentalism in the XI Jinping Era” The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, nr 1 (2022): 140-153.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Wuerth Igrid, „China, Russia, and International Law” Lawfare 11 July 2016.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.