Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Case law commentaries

Vol. 63 No. 4 (2026): Law&Social Bonds

Approving Gloss on the Resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court, Ref. III FPS 1/25, with an Assessment of Its Procedural Effects

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/5qws9289
Submitted
6 January 2026
Published
24-09-2026

Abstract

The resolution of June 16, 2025, ref. III FPS 1/25, finally ended the judicial dispute over the issue of delivering a copy of the order, i.e., whether it should be delivered to the obligated party or to the representative appointed in the main (tax assessment) case. Its procedural effects are currently particularly important in practice. It should be remembered that the delivery of this copy results in the suspension of the limitation period for the tax liability. It is likely that in a large number of proceedings, whether ongoing or already concluded, there have been defects in this respect. It is therefore necessary to consider whether the limitation period has been effectively suspended and, if the decision is already final, whether it can be declared invalid.

References

  1. Brzeziński, Bogumił. Podstawy wykładni prawa podatkowego. Gdańsk: ODDK, 2008.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Ochmann, Paweł. „Uchwały NSA w świetle konstytucyjnej zasady niezawisłości sędziów oraz ich podległości tylko Konstytucji i ustawom." Przegląd Prawa Publicznego, nr 40 (2017).
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Ofiarski, Zygmunt. Ogólne prawo podatkowe. Zagadnienia materialnoprawne i proceduralne. Warszawa: LexisNexis, 2013.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Teszner, Krzysztof. „Komentarz do art. 247." W Ordynacja podatkowa. Tom II. Procedury podatkowe. Art. 120-344. Komentarz aktualizowany, red. Leonard Etel. LEX/el.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.