Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 1 (39) (2022)

The American Security Model and Its Influence over European Social and Juridic Values

Submitted
12 December 2021
Published
01-04-2022

Abstract

The author describes the evolution from the USA individual-centric state towards the administrative and regulatory one. The author examines the very different models of security for the USA and Europe and its influence over European social and juridic values.

References

  1. Andreas Peter, Ethan Nadelmann, Policing the globe. Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Baker Bonnie, Jennifer Elsea, Charles Doyle, The Posse Comitatus Act and Related Matters. New York: Novinka, 2004.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Ballbé Manuel, „La competencia como principio vertebrador del sistema pluralista”, [in:] Anuario de la competencia de 1998. 109-123. Barcelona: Fundación ICO-Marcial Pons, 1998.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Ballbé Manuel, Roser Martínez, Soberanía Dual y Constitución Integradora. La reciente doctrina federal de la Corte Suprema norteamericana. Barcelona: Ariel, 2003.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Ballbé Manuel, Carlos Padrós, Estado competitivo y armonización europea. Barcelona: Ariel, 1997.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Derthick Martha, National Guard in Politics. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1965.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Djelic Marie-Laure, „Does Europe Mean Americanization? The Case of Competition” Competition and Change, Vol. 6 (2002): 233-250.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Djelic Marie-Laure, Exporting the American Model. The Postwar Transformation of European Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Dorman Michael, The secret service story. New York: Delacorte, 1967.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Elias Norbert, El proceso de la civilización. Madrid: FCE, 1987.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Epp Charles, The Rights Revolution. Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Font i Rius Josep Maria, Estudios sobre los derechos e instituciones locales en la Cataluña medieval. Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universidad de Barcelona, 1985.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Geradin Damien, Rodolphe Muñoz, Nicolas Petit, Regulation Through Agencies in the EU. A New Paradigm of European Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Gilligan James, Preventing Violence. London: Thames and Hudson, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Horan James, The Pinkertons: The Detective Dynasty that Made History. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 1967.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Jeffreys-Jones Rhodri, Cloak and Dollar. New Heaven: Yale University Press, 2002.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Karch, et al., „Surveillance for Violent Deaths – National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 States, 2006”, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – Morbidity and mortality weekly report (MMWR) Surveillance Summaries, December, 4 (2020) (8): 1-37. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/ss/ss6908a1.htm?s_cid=ss6908a1_w.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Kates Don, Gary Mauser, „Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 30 (2007): 649-694.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Kingsbury Benedict, Richard Stewart, Nico Krisch, „The Emergence of Global Administrative Law” Law and Contemporary Problems (2005): 15-61.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Kingsbury Benedict, „The Concept of Law in Global Administrative Law” European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009): 23-57.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Kopel David, „The Natural Right of Self-Defense: Heller’s Lesson for the World” Syracuse Law Review, 59 (2008): 99-116.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Kopel David, Paul Gallant, Joanne Eisen, „Human Rights and Gun Confiscation” QLR, 26 (2008).
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Krug Etienne, Kenneth Powell, Linda Lahlberg, „Firearm-Related Deaths in the United States and 35 Other High – and Upper-Middle – Income Countries” International Journal of Epidemiology, 27 (1998): 214-221.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Leander Anna, „Globalization and the State Monopoly on the Legitimate Use of Force” Political Science Publication, 7 (2004).
    View in Google Scholar
  25. https://www.sdu.dk/~/media/Files/Om_SDU/Institutter/Statskundskab/Skriftserie/04ANL7%20pdf.ashx
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Lott John, More Guns, Less Crime. Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2010.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Martínez Roser, Armas: Libertad americana o prevención europea? Barcelona: Ariel, 2002.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Martínez Roser, Armas: ¿Libertad americana o prevención europea?: Dos modelos contrapuestos. Editorial Académica española, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. McCleary Rachel, Robert Barro, „Religion and Economy” Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 20 (2006): 49-72.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Monnet Jean, Memorias. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 1985.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Monnier François, „La naissance du contentieux administratif moderne” Revue Administrative, 286 (1995): 348-354.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Nadelmann Ethan, Cops across borders. The internationalization of U.S. Criminal Law Enforcement. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Parrillo Nicholas, „The De-Privatization of American Warfare: How the U.S. Government Used, Regulated, and Ultimately Abandoned Privateering in the Nineteenth Century” Yale Journal of Law and Human, Vol. 19 (2007): 1-96.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Perry Ivan, „Violence: A Public Health Perspective” Global Crime, No. 4 (2009): 368-395.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17440570903248395.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Rao Gautham, „The Federal Posse Comitatus Doctrine: Slavery, Compulsion, and Statecraft in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America” Law and History Review, 26 (2008): 1-56.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Rosky Clifford, „Force, Inc.: the Privatization of Punishment, Policing, and Military Force in Liberal States” Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 36 (2004): 879-1032.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Scahill Jeremy, Blackwater. The Rise of the World Most Powerful Mercenar Army. New York: Nation Book, 2007.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Seward Desmon, The Monks of War. The Military Religious Orders. London: Penguin Books, 1995.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Shain Alan, The Myth of American Individualism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Singer Peter, Corporate Warriors. The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Skowronek Stephen, Building a New American State. The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1977-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Skowronek Stephen et al., Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Steiner Heinz, „The Indispensable Metaphor of War. On Populist Politics and the Contradictions of the State’s Monopoly of Force” Theoreticical Criminology, 7 (2003): 265-291.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Stewart Richard, „The Reformation of American Administrative Law” Harvard Law Review, 88 (1975):1167-1813.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Stewart Richard, „U.S. Administrative Law: a Model for Global Administrative Law” Law and Contemporary Problems, 68 (2005): 63-108.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Sunstein Cass, After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1990.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Ullman Walter, Il papato nel Medioevo. Roma: Laterza, 1999.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Ullman Walter, Law and Jurisdiction in the Middle Ages. Farnham: Ashgate, 1999.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Verkuil Paul, Outsourcing Sovereignty. Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Waldrep Christopher, The Many Faces of Judge Lynch. Extralegal Violence and Punishment in America. New York: Palgrave, 2002.
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Wessel Jared, „The Financial Action Task Force: a Study in Balancing Sovereignty with Equality in Global Administrative Law” Widener Law Review, 13 (2006): 169-198.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Whitlock Craig, The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War. New York: Simon&Schuster, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Wood Jennifer, Clifford Shearing, Imaging Security. Portland-Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 2007.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Zimmerman Frederic, District of Columbia et al. v. Heller: Supreme Court Establishes an Individual Right to Bear Arms Under the Second Amendment. So much for Gun Control. Ann Arbor: Nimble Books LLC, 2008.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.